Cited by 230Digital Transformation in IndustrySemantic Web and Ontologieslinguistics and terminology studies

Extracting and mapping industry 4.0 technologies using wikipedia

Open access
Chiarello, Filippo, Trivelli, Leonello, Bonaccorsi, Andrea, Fantoni, Gualtiero·2018·Computers in Industry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compind.2018.04.006

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiarello, F., Trivelli, L., Bonaccorsi, A., & Fantoni, G.
Affiliations
University of Pisa (IT)
Corresponding author
Chiarello, Filippo
Venue
Computers in Industry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
100
Pages
244-257
ISSN
0166-3615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804640380
Cited by
230
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 2
FWCI
21.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Industry (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › linguistics and terminology studies
Keywords
Industry 4.0, Wikipedia, semantic knowledge extraction, terminology standardization, shared vocabulary, technology mapping, reference architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review