Cited by 13Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SMILE: Siamese Multi-scale Interactive-representation LEarning for Hierarchical Diffeomorphic Deformable image registration

Open access
Gao, Xiaoru, Zheng, Guoyan·2024·Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Deformable medical image registration plays an important role in many clinical applications. It aims to find a dense deformation field to establish point-wise correspondences between a pair of fixed and moving images. Recently, unsupervised deep learning-based registration methods have drawn more and more attention because of fast inference at testing stage. Despite remarkable progress, existing deep learning-based methods suffer from several limitations including: (a) they often overlook the explicit modeling of feature correspondences due to limited receptive fields; (b) the performance on image pairs with large spatial displacements is still limited since the dense deformation field is regressed from features learned by local convolutions; and (c) desirable properties, including topology-preservation and the invertibility of transformation, are often ignored. To address above limitations, we propose a novel Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) consisting of a Siamese Multi-scale Interactive-representation LEarning (SMILE) encoder and a Hierarchical Diffeomorphic Deformation (HDD) decoder. Specifically, the SMILE encoder aims for effective feature representation learning and spatial correspondence establishing while the HDD decoder seeks to regress the dense deformation field in a coarse-to-fine manner. We additionally propose a novel Local Invertible Loss (LIL) to encourage topology-preservation and local invertibility of the regressed transformation while keeping high registration accuracy. Extensive experiments conducted on two publicly available brain image datasets demonstrate the superiority of our method over the state-of-the-art (SOTA) approaches. Specifically, on the Neurite-OASIS dataset, our method achieved an average DSC of 0.815 and an average ASSD of 0.633 mm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2023.102322

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Alam, 2018, Medical image registration in image guided surgery: Issues, challenges and research opportunities, Biocybern. Biomed. Eng., 38, 71, 10.1016/j.bbe.2017.10.001 · DOI
  2. Avants, 2008, Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain, Med. Image Anal., 12, 26, 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 · DOI
  3. Balakrishnan, 2019, Voxelmorph: a learning framework for deformable medical image registration, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 38, 1788, 10.1109/TMI.2019.2897538 · DOI
  4. Beg, 2005, Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 61, 139, 10.1023/B:VISI.0000043755.93987.aa · DOI
  5. Cao, 2018, Deformable image registration using a cue-aware deep regression network, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 65, 1900, 10.1109/TBME.2018.2822826 · DOI
  6. Chaudhury, 2005, The influence of elastic modulus and thickness on the release of the soft-fouling green alga ulva linza (syn. enteromorpha linza) from poly (dimethylsiloxane)(pdms) model networks, Biofouling, 21, 41, 10.1080/08927010500044377 · DOI
  7. Chen, 2022, Transmorph: Transformer for unsupervised medical image registration, Med. Image Anal., 82, 10.1016/j.media.2022.102615 · DOI
  8. Dalca, 2019, Unsupervised learning of probabilistic diffeomorphic registration for images and surfaces, Med. Image Anal., 57, 226, 10.1016/j.media.2019.07.006 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dimou, 2013, A systematic review of functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging modalities used in presurgical planning of brain tumour resection, Neurosurg. Rev., 36, 205, 10.1007/s10143-012-0436-8 · DOI
  10. Estienne, 2020, Deep learning-based concurrent brain registration and tumor segmentation, Front. Comput. Neurosci., 14, 17, 10.3389/fncom.2020.00017 · DOI
  11. Fan, 2019, Birnet: Brain image registration using dual-supervised fully convolutional networks, Med. Image Anal., 54, 193, 10.1016/j.media.2019.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Fischl, 2012, Freesurfer, Neuroimage, 62, 774, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Glocker, 2008, Dense image registration through mrfs and efficient linear programming, Med. Image Anal., 12, 731, 10.1016/j.media.2008.03.006 · DOI
  14. Heinrich, 2012, Mind: Modality independent neighbourhood descriptor for multi-modal deformable registration, Med. Image Anal., 16, 1423, 10.1016/j.media.2012.05.008 · DOI
  15. Higueras-Esteban, 2021, Sylvius: A multimodal and multidisciplinary platform for epilepsy surgery, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 203, 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106042 · DOI
  16. Hong, 2010, An effective point-based registration tool for surgical navigation, Surg. Endosc., 24, 944, 10.1007/s00464-009-0568-2 · DOI
  17. Hu, 2018, Weakly-supervised convolutional neural networks for multimodal image registration, Med. Image Anal., 49, 1, 10.1016/j.media.2018.07.002 · DOI
  18. Hu, 2022, Recursive decomposition network for deformable image registration, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf., 26, 5130, 10.1109/JBHI.2022.3189696 · DOI
  19. Joshi, 2023, R2net: Efficient and flexible diffeomorphic image registration using lipschitz continuous residual networks, Med. Image Anal., 10.1016/j.media.2023.102917 · DOI
  20. Kang, 2022, Dual-stream pyramid registration network, Med. Image Anal., 78, 10.1016/j.media.2022.102379 · DOI
  21. Kim, 2021, Cyclemorph: cycle consistent unsupervised deformable image registration, Med. Image Anal., 71, 10.1016/j.media.2021.102036 · DOI
  22. Lv, 2022, Joint progressive and coarse-to-fine registration of brain mri via deformation field integration and non-rigid feature fusion, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 41, 2788, 10.1109/TMI.2022.3170879 · DOI
  23. Marcus, 2007, Open access series of imaging studies (oasis): cross-sectional mri data in young, middle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 19, 1498, 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1498 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Sengupta, 2012, A survey on mutual information based medical image registration algorithms, Neurocomputing, 486, 174, 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.11.023 · DOI
  25. Thirion, 1998, Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with maxwell’s demons, Med. Image Anal., 2, 243, 10.1016/S1361-8415(98)80022-4 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Toga, 2001, The role of image registration in brain mapping, Image Vis. Comput., 19, 3, 10.1016/S0262-8856(00)00055-X · DOI
  27. Vercauteren, 2009, Diffeomorphic demons: Efficient non-parametric image registration, NeuroImage, 45, S61, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.040 · DOI
  28. Woods, 1998, Automated image registration: I. general methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation, J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr., 22, 139, 10.1097/00004728-199801000-00027 · DOI
  29. Zhao, 2019, Unsupervised 3d end-to-end medical image registration with volume tweening network, IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf., 24, 1394, 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2951024 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Gao, X., & Zheng, G.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Venue
Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
111
Pages
102322
ISSN
  • 0730-4862 (ISSN-L)
  • 0895-6111
OpenAlex
W4390278351
Cited by
13
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A20199)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
deformable image registration, diffeomorphic registration, Siamese encoder, multi-scale features, topology preservation, brain MRI registration
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review