Cited by 2,163Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS): Cross-sectional MRI Data in Young, Middle Aged, Nondemented, and Demented Older Adults

Open access
Marcus, Daniel S., Wang, Tracy H., Parker, Jamie, Csernansky, John G., Morris, John C., Buckner, Randy L.·2007·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The Open Access Series of Imaging Studies is a series of magnetic resonance imaging data sets that is publicly available for study and analysis. The initial data set consists of a cross-sectional collection of 416 subjects aged 18 to 96 years. One hundred of the included subjects older than 60 years have been clinically diagnosed with very mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. The subjects are all right-handed and include both men and women. For each subject, three or four individual T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans obtained in single imaging sessions are included. Multiple within-session acquisitions provide extremely high contrast-to-noise ratio, making the data amenable to a wide range of analytic approaches including automated computational analysis. Additionally, a reliability data set is included containing 20 subjects without dementia imaged on a subsequent visit within 90 days of their initial session. Automated calculation of whole-brain volume and estimated total intracranial volume are presented to demonstrate use of the data for measuring differences associated with normal aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1498

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcus, D. S., Wang, T. H., Parker, J., Csernansky, J. G., Morris, J. C., & Buckner, R. L.
Affiliations
  • 1Washington University
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2007-09-01
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
1498-1507
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2150534249
Cited by
2,163
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 217 · 2025: 270 · 2024: 231 · 2023: 177 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 158 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 96 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 70
FWCI
19.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG021910, P50AG005681, P01AG003991)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH071616)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR16594, RR 14075, P41RR014075, R01RR016594)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, dementia, normal aging, brain structure, T1-weighted imaging, total brain volume, intracranial volume, older adults, OASIS
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dementia, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review