Cited by 35Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Psychological mindedness and symptom reduction after psychotherapy in a heterogeneous psychiatric sample

Nyklíček, Ivan, Majoor, Daphne, Schalken, Pierre A.A.M.·2010·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Psychological mindedness (PM) has been claimed to be beneficial for outcome of various forms of psychotherapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of PM on the therapy results of a psychiatric patient sample with heterogeneous psychological symptoms.Methods Participants were 110 patients with different diagnoses who were hospitalized at the Center for Psychological Recovery (Rosmalen, Netherlands). Before and after treatment, they were asked to complete the Balanced Index of Psychological Mindedness and the Symptom Checklist-90.Results Baseline PM was not associated with a decrease in symptom scores (F(8,73) < 1.0; P > .20; partial eta(2) < 0.10). However, PM increased over the course of the intervention (F(2,84) = 43.54; P < .001; eta(2) = 0.51) and larger increases in the insight component of PM were associated with larger decreases on 6 of 8 symptom scores (F(8,70) = 3.55; P < .005; partial eta(2) = 0.29).Conclusions These results suggest that although a high PM is not a prerequisite for successful cognitive behavioral therapy, an increase in insight is associated with better outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.02.004

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nyklíček, I., Majoor, D., & Schalken, P. A. A. M.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
492-496
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014322307
Cited by
35
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
psychological mindedness, psychotherapy outcome, symptom relief, cognitive behavioral therapy, insight, psychiatric inpatients, SCL-90
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Awareness, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Psychotherapeutic Processes, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Multivariate Analysis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review