Cited by 133Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Defining clinical severity in adults with obsessive–compulsive disorder

Open access
Storch, Eric A., De Nadai, Alessandro S., Conceição do Rosário, Maria, Shavitt, Roseli G., Torres, Albina R., Ferrão, Ygor A., Miguel, Euripedes C., Lewin, Adam B. +1 more·2015·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is the most commonly used instrument to assess the clinical severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Treatment determinations are often based on Y-BOCS score thresholds. However, these benchmarks are not empirically based, which may result in non-evidence based treatment decisions. Accordingly, the present study sought to derive empirically-based benchmarks for defining obsessive-compulsive symptom severity. METHOD: Nine hundred fifty-four adult patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), recruited through the Brazilian Research Consortium on Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders, were evaluated by experienced clinicians using a structured clinical interview, the Y-BOCS, and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale (CGI-Severity). RESULTS: Similar to results in treatment-seeking children with OCD, our findings demonstrated convergence between the Y-BOCS and global OCD severity assessed by the CGI-Severity (Nagelkerke R(2)=.48). Y-BOCS scores of 0-13 corresponded with 'mild symptoms' (CGI-Severity=0-2), 14-25 with 'moderate symptoms' (CGI-Severity=3), 26-34 with 'moderate-severe symptoms' (CGI-Severity=4) and 35-40 with 'severe symptoms' (CGI-Severity=5-6). Neither age nor ethnicity was associated with Y-BOCS scores, but females demonstrated more severe obsessive-compulsive symptoms than males (d=.34). Time spent on obsessions/compulsions, interference, distress, resistance, and control were significantly related to global OCD severity although the symptom resistance item pairing demonstrated a less robust relationship relative to other components of the Y-BOCS. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide empirically-based benchmarks on the Y-BOCS for defining the clinical severity of treatment seeking adults with OCD, which can be used for normative comparisons in the clinic and for future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.08.007

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]First MB Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinician Version-(SCID-CV) 1996 Washington, DC American Psychiatric Press, Inc

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Storch, E. A., De Nadai, A. S., Conceição do Rosário, M., Shavitt, R. G., Torres, A. R., Ferrão, Y. A., Miguel, E. C., Lewin, A. B., & Fontenelle, L. F.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (BR)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Corresponding author
Storch, Eric A.
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
63
Pages
30-35
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101309614
Cited by
133
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (F31 MH094095, 420.122/2005-2)
  • National Institutes of Health (F31 MH094095, 420.122/2005-2)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31 MH094095, 420.122/2005-2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, clinical severity, Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, treatment decision-making
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brazil, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review