Cited by 59Survey Methodology and NonresponsePsychological Testing and AssessmentElectronic Health Records Systems

Validation of the NetSCID: An automated web-based adaptive version of the SCID

Open access
Brodey, Benjamin B., First, Michael, Linthicum, Jared, Haman, Kirsten, Sasiela, Jordan W., Ayer, David·2016·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

The present study developed and validated a configurable, adaptive, web-based version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM, the NetSCID. The validation included 24 clinicians who administered the SCID and 230 participants who completed the paper SCID and/or the NetSCID. Data-entry errors, branching errors, and clinician satisfaction were quantified. Relative to the paper SCID, the NetSCID resulted in far fewer data-entry and branching errors. Clinicians 'preferred' using the NetSCID and found that the NetSCID was easier to administer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.10.005

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JB 2002 Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition. (SCID-I/P) New York Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brodey, B. B., First, M., Linthicum, J., Haman, K., Sasiela, J. W., & Ayer, D.
Affiliations
  • Telesage (United States) (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Brodey, Benjamin B.
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
66
Pages
67-70
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2173507636
Cited by
59
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH080463, R43MH080463, R44MH080463)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
online assessment, data entry errors, provider satisfaction, psychiatric diagnosis, instrument validation
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Software, Reproducibility of Results, Internet, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review