Cited by 16Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentStress Responses and CortisolSchizophrenia research and treatment

Pituitary gland shrinkage in bipolar disorder: The role of gender

Delvecchio, Giuseppe, Mandolini, Gian Mario, Perlini, Cinzia, Barillari, Marco, Marinelli, Veronica, Ruggeri, Mirella, Altamura, A. Carlo, Bellani, Marcella +1 more·2018·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Hyperactivity of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis (HPAA) has been consistently reported in mood disorders. However, only few studies investigated the Pituitary gland (PG) in Bipolar Disorder (BD) and the results are so far contrasting. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the integrity of the PG as well as the role of gender and the impact of clinical measurements on this structure in a sample of BD patients compared to healthy controls (HC). Methods 34 BD patients and 41 HC underwent a 1.5 T MRI scan. PG volumes were manually traced for all subjects. Psychiatric symptoms were assessed by means of the Brief Psychiatry Rating Scale, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Bech Rafaelsen Mania Rating Scale. Results We found decreased PG volumes in BD patients compared to HC (F = 24.9, p Conclusions Our findings suggest that BD patients have decreased PG volumes, probably due to the long-term hyperactivity of the HPAA and to the consequent strengthening of the negative feedback control towards the PG volume itself. This alteration was particularly evident in females, suggesting a role of gender in affecting PG volumes in BD. Finally, the absence of significant correlations between PG volumes and clinical variables further supports that PG disruption is a trait feature of BD, being independent of symptoms severity and duration of treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.01.014

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delvecchio, G., Mandolini, G. M., Perlini, C., Barillari, M., Marinelli, V., Ruggeri, M., Altamura, A. C., Bellani, M., & Brambilla, P.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Eugenio Medea (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT)
Corresponding author
Brambilla, Paolo
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
82
Pages
95-99
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793919597
Cited by
16
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministero della Salute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
bipolar disorder, pituitary gland, pituitary volume, gender differences, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, hyperactivity, negative feedback control, brain structure
MeSH terms
Adult, Bipolar Disorder, Female, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Organ Size, Pituitary Gland, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Sex Characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review