Cited by 26Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Scrupulosity and hoarding

Open access
Frost, Randy O., Gabrielson, Isabella, Deady, Sophia, Dernbach, Kathryn Bonner, Guevara, Greta, Peebles-Dorin, Maggie, Yap, Keong, Grisham, Jessica R.·2018·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Recent evidence suggests that avoiding waste may be a prominent motive to save in hoarding disorder. Such beliefs are reminiscent of scrupulosity obsessions in OCD. This paper reports on three studies examining scrupulosity-like beliefs in hoarding and the development and validation of a measure of material scrupulosity.Methods Study one examined the reliability and validity of a measure of material scrupulosity (MOMS) and its relationship to hoarding in a college student sample, as well as the relationship between hoarding and OCD-base scrupulosity. Study 2 examined the psychometric properties of the MOMS in a replication of study 1 with a sample of people with hoarding problems. Study 3 examined the reliability and validity of the MOMS in a large nonclinical/community sample.Results Findings across the studies provided evidence for the reliability and validity of the MOMS. It was highly correlated with hoarding symptoms, especially difficulty discarding, and hoarding related beliefs, especially responsibility beliefs. It accounted for significant variance in hoarding symptoms independent of other correlates, including other hoarding beliefs. OCD-based scrupulosity was correlated with hoarding in sample 1, but not in the hoarding sample in study 2.Conclusions Material Scrupulosity refers to an exaggerated sense of duty or moral/ethical responsibility for the care and disposition of possessions to prevent their being harmed or wasted. It appears to be distinct from other hoarding-related beliefs and a significant predictor of hoarding symptoms. The MOMS appears to possess good reliability and validity in both clinical and nonclinical samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.06.011

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to their strong, albeit insecure, emotional attachment to objects and an excessive fear of waste, individuals with hoarding disorder find discarding or donating their possessions to be an extremely challenging task.

    “Due to their strong, albeit insecure, emotional attachment to objects (Yap andGrisham, 2019, 2020) and an excessive fear of waste (Frost et al., 2018), individuals with HD find discarding or donating their possessions to be an extremely challenging task.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frost, R. O., Gabrielson, I., Deady, S., Dernbach, K. B., Guevara, G., Peebles-Dorin, M., Yap, K., & Grisham, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Smith College (US)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Frost, Randy O.
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
86
Pages
19-24
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884540293
Cited by
26
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Smith ScholarWorks (Smith College) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
hoarding disorder, scrupulosity, obsessive-compulsive disorder, responsibility beliefs, measurement development, psychometric validation, gender differences
MeSH terms
Hoarding Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Guilt, Humans, Male, Motivation, Obsessive Behavior, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Hoarding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review