Cited by 71Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

Unpacking the construct of emotional attachment to objects and its association with hoarding symptoms

Open access
Yap, Keong, Grisham, Jessica R.·2019·Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Abstract

Background and aims: The appetitive aspects of hoarding disorder, such as the compulsive acquisition and saving of objects, are akin to other behavioral addictions. Underpinning these appetitive features is the strong emotional and sentimental attachments that hoarding sufferers have for their possessions. Different facets of object attachment have been identified including anthropomorphism, insecure object attachment, possessions as an extension of identity, possessions as a repository of autobiographical memories, and possessions as a source of comfort and safety. The aim of this study was to examine the association between each of these facets and hoarding symptoms independent of non-sentimental hoarding beliefs, depression, and anxiety. Methods: Participants were 532 individuals recruited via Turkprime who completed online self-report questionnaires on hoarding symptoms, hoarding beliefs, depression, anxiety, and the facets of object attachment. Pearson’s correlations and hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted. Results: The results showed that all facets of object attachment were positively correlated with hoarding symptoms. After accounting for other non-sentimental hoarding beliefs, depression, and anxiety, three facets made significant unique contributions to hoarding symptoms: insecure object attachment, anthropomorphism, and possessions as a repository of autobiographical memories. Discussion and conclusions: Based on these findings, we propose a compensatory model to explain how the different facets of object attachment may be implicated in hoarding. Further research into ways of reducing anthropomorphism, insecure object attachment, and possessions as memories are warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1556/2006.8.2019.15

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ethnic make-up of both samples was consistent with previous US MTurk and Australian undergraduate samples.

    “The ethnic make-up of both samples was consistent with previous US MTurk and Australian undergraduate samples (e.g., Norberg et al., 2017; Yap and Grisham, 2019).”

    From Why did all the toilet paper disappear? Distinguishing between panic buying and hoarding during COVID-19 (2021) · cites this paper as Yap and Grisham, 2019

    The Methods > Participants section reports the ethnic composition of a prior MTurk sample, making this paper a relevant comparator for that part of the sentence. It specifies that recruitment was restricted to North American workers, however, and does not establish that the sample was specifically from the US. The Australian undergraduate comparison is not attributed specifically to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Yap K. Grisham J. R. (2018, October). The development and validation of the Possessions as Memories and Self-Extensions Scale. Paper presented at Poster session presented at the 39th National Conference of the Australian Association for Cognitive and Behaviour Therapy, Brisbane, Australia.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yap, K., & Grisham, J. R.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Yap, Keong
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Addictions
Published
2019-05-21
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
249-258
ISSN
  • 2062-5871 (ISSN-L)
  • 2063-5303
OpenAlex
W2946117837
Cited by
71
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
hoarding disorder, emotional attachment to objects, anthropomorphism, compensatory model, behavioral addiction
MeSH terms
Hoarding Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Object Attachment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review