Cited by 37Consumer Retail Behavior StudiesGambling Behavior and TreatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Stress and Compulsive Buying-Shopping Disorder: A Scoping Review

Open access
Thomas, Tobias A., Schmid, Anna M., Kessling, Annica, Wolf, Oliver T., Brand, Matthias, Steins-Loeber, Sabine, Müller, Astrid·2024·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Theoretical frameworks of behavioral addictions mostly acknowledge the role of stress in the development and maintenance of these disorders, models of compulsive buying-shopping disorder (CBSD) however rarely incorporated stress. The association between stress and CBSD has not been reviewed yet. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to evaluate empirical results on the association between stress and CBSD. A comprehensive search string was employed in three databases. RESULTS: 16 studies were included. Correlative studies suggested significant correlations between general perceived stress and CBSD symptom severity. Studies involving mean comparisons found higher general perceived stress levels in persons with problematic buying-shopping behavior/CBSD compared to control participants (large effects). Mixed results were found in studies involving regression/structural equation models and ecological momentary assessments. One study with a stress/negative mood induction observed more CBSD symptoms in a high stress group compared to a low stress group. DISCUSSION: The studies are heterogeneous concerning design, samples and measures. Only very few studies surpass the level of cross-sectional correlative data which limits the ability to draw clear conclusions. Future research should study the impact of experimentally induced stress on CBSD symptoms, examine the relationship between stress and CBSD longitudinally and assess objective stress markers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152482

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 110 · Cited by 37

Authors
Thomas, T. A., Schmid, A. M., Kessling, A., Wolf, O. T., Brand, M., Steins-Loeber, S., & Müller, A.
Affiliations
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • University of Bamberg (DE)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DE)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Tobias A.
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
132
Pages
152482
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394580224
Cited by
37
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (411232260)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
stress, perceived stress, behavioral addiction, negative mood induction, symptom severity
MeSH terms
Compulsive Behavior, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review