The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cork–PLA composite filaments for fused deposition modelling
Abstract
Abstract We report design and development of cork–poly(lactic acid) (PLA) biodegradable filaments for fused deposition modelling (FDM), which is an additive manufacturing technique. Composites of varying cork composition were melt compounded in an internal mixer and compression moulded for characterisation of mechanical, thermal and morphological properties. Inclusion of cork granules decreased the tensile strength, but improved impact strength. As the cork percentage increased, density of the composites decreased. Hence, the specific modulus and specific tensile strength properties improved as the cork content increased in the composites. Tributyl citrate (TBC), a biodegradable plasticiser, was used to overcome the inherent brittleness of PLA. TBC decreased the modulus, tensile yield strength; however it increased ductility of the composites. A selected cork composite was used for filament production and it proved to be suitable for fused deposition modelling. 3D printed composites were compared with compression moulded composites. 3D printing resulted in slightly lower elastic modulus and tensile yield strength, but higher elongation at break compared with compression moulded composites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Literature Review of Poly(Lactic Acid)
Garlotta, D. (2001) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1023/a:1020200822435 · Cited by 3,707
Farah, S., Anderson, D. G., & Langer, R. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012 · Cited by 3,443
Cited by
Shanmugam, V., Das, O., Babu, K., Marimuthu, U., Veerasimman, A., Johnson, D. J., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., Ramakrishna, S., & Berto, F. (2021) · International Journal of Fatigue · doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106007 · Cited by 538
Recent Developments in Fused Deposition Modeling-Based 3D Printing of Polymers and Their Composites
Rahim, T. N. A. T., Abdullah, A. M., & Md Akil, H. (2019) · Polymer Reviews · doi:10.1080/15583724.2019.1597883 · Cited by 452
Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications
Rajan, K., Samykano, M., Kadirgama, K., Harun, W. S. W., & Rahman, M. M. (2022) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-022-08860-7 · Cited by 426
Shanmugam, V., Rajendran, D. J. J., Babu, K., Rajendran, S., Veerasimman, A., Marimuthu, U., Singh, S., Das, O., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., et al. (2021) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106925 · Cited by 268
Ahmad, N. D., Kusmono, Wildan, M. W., & Herianto (2023) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100842 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Daver, F., Lee, K. P. M., Brandt, M., & Shanks, R.
- Venue
- Composites Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 168
- Pages
- 230-237
- ISSN
- 0266-3538 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2895671797
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cork–PLA composite filaments for fused deposition modelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.008
- The paper
- Daver, F., Lee, K. P. M., Brandt, M., & Shanks, R. (2018). Cork–PLA composite filaments for fused deposition modelling. Composites Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
