The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent Developments in Fused Deposition Modeling-Based 3D Printing of Polymers and Their Composites
Abstract
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is one of the most widely used 3D printing techniques that utilizes polymers to create models, prototypes or even end products. Since 2009, the demand for FDM has been increasing at an incredible rate from one year to the next, and many experts believe that this technology has the potential to revolutionize manufacturing in many sectors. The main advantages of FDM technology are that the technique offers a simpler fabrication process and a more cost-effective method compared to other prominent 3D printing techniques, and yet, it is still capable of manufacturing complex geometries and cavities with reasonable dimensional accuracy. However, there are still some limitations and shortcomings that have been identified, especially pertaining to the lower mechanical properties exhibited in FDM parts compared to the parts produced by conventional methods such as injection and compression techniques. Therefore, this review article focused on recent developments and progress in the FDM technique in an attempt to improve the end performance of 3D-printed parts, along with current challenges and the future direction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2958 · Cited by 7,034
A Literature Review of Poly(Lactic Acid)
Garlotta, D. (2001) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1023/a:1020200822435 · Cited by 3,707
3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective
Wang, X., Jiang, M., Zhou, Z., Gou, J., & Hui, D. (2017) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 · Cited by 3,325
A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering
Melchels, F. P. W., Feijen, J., & Grijpma, D. W. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050 · Cited by 2,457
Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS
Ahn, S., Montero, M., Odell, D., Roundy, S., & Wright, P. K. (2002) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540210441166 · Cited by 2,382
3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities
Stansbury, J. W., & Idacavage, M. J. (2016) · Dental Materials · doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018 · Cited by 1,732
Ning, F., Cong, W., Qiu, J., Wei, J., & Wang, S. (2015) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 · Cited by 1,718
Chacón, J. M., Caminero, M. A., García-Plaza, E., & Núñez, P. J. (2017) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 · Cited by 1,603
Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing
Tekinalp, H. L., Kunc, V., Velez-Garcia, G. M., Duty, C. E., Love, L. J., Naskar, A. K., Blue, C. A., & Ozcan, S. (2014) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 · Cited by 1,514
Mohamed, O. A., Masood, S. H., & Bhowmik, J. L. (2015) · Advances in Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 · Cited by 1,481
Cited by
Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., & Tran, P. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12071529 · Cited by 1,052
Azad, M. A., Olawuni, D., Kimbell, G., Badruddoza, A. Z. M., Hossain, M. S., & Sultana, T. (2020) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12020124 · Cited by 356
Menčík, P., Přikryl, R., Krobot, Š., Melčová, V., Kontárová, S., Plavec, R., Bočkaj, J., Horváth, V., & Alexy, P. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms232214409 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahim, T. N. A. T., Abdullah, A. M., & Md Akil, H.
- Venue
- Polymer Reviews
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-04-22
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 589-624
- ISSN
- 0736-6574 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-3724
- 1558-3716
- OpenAlex
- W2942215253
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 116
- FWCI
- 18.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent Developments in Fused Deposition Modeling-Based 3D Printing of Polymers and Their Composites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/15583724.2019.1597883
- The paper
- Rahim, T. N. A. T., Abdullah, A. M., & Md Akil, H. (2019). Recent Developments in Fused Deposition Modeling-Based 3D Printing of Polymers and Their Composites. Polymer Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2019.1597883
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.