The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of 3D printed long fibre reinforced composites
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Additive Layer Manufacturing (ALM) process is used in the present investigation to manufacture long fibre reinforced composite parts using the MarkOne® 3D-printer. In ALM, a continuous filament (including a tow of fibres) of composite material is injected by the printer, at high temperature, over a plain tool, forming the part while the material is cooled down. The used composite filament is formed by a PA (Nylon™) matrix and carbon or glass fibre reinforcements. Previous works have shown an improvement on the mechanical properties of a part, when some zones include a nylon based composite reinforcement using ALM. Nevertheless, the characterization of fully made nylon-based ALM composite material parts has not been reported. Thus, the aim of this investigation is the experimental characterization of composite nylon-based coupons. The plane strength and stiffness properties of the composites are obtained, both for tensile and compression load states. Results showed that the obtained mechanical properties for ALM composites are not yet comparable to those obtained by traditional methods (pre-pregs). This fact may be explained by the high porosity found in ALM coupons as well as a low fibre volume obtained. Nevertheless, the mechanical properties improvement in comparison to non-reinforced nylon parts is remarkable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wickramasinghe, S., Do, T., & Tran, P. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12071529 · Cited by 1,052
Kabir, S. M. F., Mathur, K., & Seyam, A.-F. M. (2020) · Composite Structures · doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476 · Cited by 678
Recent Progress in Additive Manufacturing of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite
Goh, G. D., Yap, Y. L., Agarwala, S., & Yeong, W. Y. (2019) · Advanced Materials Technologies · doi:10.1002/admt.201800271 · Cited by 621
Shanmugam, V., Das, O., Babu, K., Marimuthu, U., Veerasimman, A., Johnson, D. J., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., Ramakrishna, S., & Berto, F. (2021) · International Journal of Fatigue · doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106007 · Cited by 538
Fused deposition modeling: process, materials, parameters, properties, and applications
Rajan, K., Samykano, M., Kadirgama, K., Harun, W. S. W., & Rahman, M. M. (2022) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-022-08860-7 · Cited by 426
3D‐Printed Anisotropic Polymer Materials for Functional Applications
Chen, J., Liu, X., Tian, Y., Zhu, W., Yan, C., Shi, Y., Kong, L. B., Qi, H. J., & Zhou, K. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202102877 · Cited by 281
Shanmugam, V., Rajendran, D. J. J., Babu, K., Rajendran, S., Veerasimman, A., Marimuthu, U., Singh, S., Das, O., Neisiany, R. E., Hedenqvist, M. S., et al. (2021) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106925 · Cited by 268
Various FDM Mechanisms Used in the Fabrication of Continuous-Fiber Reinforced Composites: A Review
Karimi, A., Rahmatabadi, D., & Baghani, M. (2024) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym16060831 · Cited by 201
Yanamandra, K., Chen, G. L., Xu, X., Mac, G., & Gupta, N. (2020) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108318 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Justo, J., Távara, L., García-Guzmán, L., & París, F.
- Venue
- Composite Structures
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 185
- Pages
- 537-548
- ISSN
- 0263-8223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2768196135
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
