Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 829

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The neural representation of time

Ivry, Richard B, Spencer, Rebecca MC·2004·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.013

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Semjen A: Emergent versus programmed temporal properties of movement sequences. In Time and Mind Edited by Helfrich H. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber; 1996:25-43.
  2. Turvey MT: Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision. In Perceiving, Acting and Knowing. Edited by Bransford R. Hillsdale NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum; 1977:211-265.
  3. Pfeuty, 2003, Processes involved in tempo perception: a CNV analysis, Psychophysiology, 40, 69, 10.1111/1469-8986.00008 · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00008

Cited by

See all 829

Metadata

Authors
Ivry, R. B., & Spencer, R. M.
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
225-232
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103570990
Cited by
829
References
71
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The neural representation of time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.013
The paper
Ivry, R. B., & Spencer, R. M. (2004). The neural representation of time. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.