Cited by 362Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epigenetic influences on brain development and plasticity

Open access
Fagiolini, Michela, Jensen, Catherine L, Champagne, Frances A·2009·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

A fine interplay exists between sensory experience and innate genetic programs leading to the sculpting of neuronal circuits during early brain development. Recent evidence suggests that the dynamic regulation of gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms is at the interface between environmental stimuli and long lasting molecular, cellular and complex behavioral phenotypes acquired during periods of developmental plasticity. Understanding these mechanisms may give insight into the formation of critical periods and provide new strategies for increasing plasticity and adaptive change in adulthood.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2009.05.009

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 362

Metadata

Authors
Fagiolini, M., Jensen, C. L., & Champagne, F. A.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Champagne, Frances A
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
207-212
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031043159
Cited by
362
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp2od001674-01)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD007430)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
epigenetics, brain development, neuroplasticity, sensory experience, gene expression regulation, neural circuit formation, critical period, environmental stimuli, behavioral phenotypes, adult neuroplasticity
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Brain, Critical Period, Psychological, Humans, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review