Cited by 56Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchCircadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Neuronal substrates of sleep homeostasis; lessons from flies, rats and mice

Donlea, Jeffrey M, Alam, Md Noor, Szymusiak, Ronald·2017·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Sleep homeostasis is a fundamental property of vigilance state regulation that is highly conserved across species. Neuronal systems and circuits that underlie sleep homeostasis are not well understood. In Drosophila, a neuronal circuit involving neurons in the ellipsoid body and in the dorsal Fan-shaped body is a candidate for both tracing sleep need during waking and translating it to increased sleep drive and expression. Sleep homeostasis in rats and mice involves multiple neuromodulators acting on multiple wake- and sleep-promoting neuronal systems. A functional central homeostat emerges from A 1 receptor mediated actions of adenosine on wake-promoting neurons in the basal forebrain and hypothalamus, and A 2A adenosine receptor-mediated actions on sleep-promoting neurons in the preoptic hypothalamus and nucleus accumbens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2017.05.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fatigue in individuals with hypothalamic syndrome could potentially be related to disordered signaling from GABAergic neurons in the suprachiasmatic, ventrolateral, and preoptic nuclei.

    “Commonly reported fatigue (72, 73) could potentially be related to disordered signaling from γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic neurons in the suprachiasmatic, ventrolateral, and preoptic nuclei (74, 75).”

    From Approach to the patient with acquired hypothalamic syndrome (2026) · cites this paper as [75]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donlea, J. M., Alam, M. N., & Szymusiak, R.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Szymusiak, Ronald
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
44
Pages
228-235
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2686514674
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Veterans Affairs (BX00155605, BX000936)
  • National Institutes of Health (NS092383)
  • Sleep Research Society Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
sleep homeostasis, sleep drive, sleep need, Drosophila, ellipsoid body, adenosine A1 receptor, adenosine A2A receptor, wake-promoting neurons, sleep-promoting neurons, hypothalamus, basal forebrain, preoptic hypothalamus, nucleus accumbens, neuromodulators, neural circuits
MeSH terms
Adenosine, Animals, Homeostasis, Neurons, Sleep, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review