The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Beneficial role of nanosilica in cement based materials – A review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Performance enhancement of recycled concrete aggregate – A review
Shi, C., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Li, W., Chong, L., & Xie, Z. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.057 · Cited by 1,157
Influence of nanoparticles on fluidity and mechanical properties of cement mortar
Liu, J., Li, Q., & Xu, S. (2015) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.149 · Cited by 184
Monasterio, M., Gaitero, J. J., Erkizia, E., Guerrero Bustos, A. M., Miccio, L. A., Dolado, J. S., & Cerveny, S. (2015) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2015.02.066 · Cited by 106
An overview of beneficiary aspects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on performance of cement composites
Kumar, M., Bansal, M., & Garg, R. (2021) · Materials Today: Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.215 · Cited by 73
Barkoula, N.-M., Ioannou, C., Aggelis, D. G., & Matikas, T. E. (2016) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.055 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, L. P., Karade, S. R., Bhattacharyya, S. K., Yousuf, M. M., & Ahalawat, S.
- Venue
- Construction and Building Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 47
- Pages
- 1069-1077
- ISSN
- 0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007429962
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 58.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.