The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design 3D printing cementitious materials via Fuller Thompson theory and Marson-Percy model
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Cementitious materials for 3D printing have special requirements for rheological properties, which are significantly affected by many factors, including sand gradation and packing fraction. Fuller Thompson theory and Marson-Percy model are classic approaches for sand gradation and packing fraction optimization, respectively. This paper attempts to apply Fuller Thompson theory and Marson-Percy model in designing cementitious materials for 3D Cementitious Materials Printing (3DCMP). Various gradation methods adopted in this study were Fuller Thompson gradation (mixture A), uniform-gradations (mixture B and C), gap-gradations (mixture D and E). Besides these mixtures with special gradation approaches, one mixture using natural river sand (mixture F) was prepared as well. Rheological properties were characterized by static/dynamic yield stress and plastic viscosity in Bingham Plastic model. Buildability was examined by printing a column with 10 cm inner diameter via a gantry printer. Rheological test results indicate that mixture A designed by continuous gradation possesses the highest static/dynamic yield stress and lowest plastic viscosity. During printing test for buildability, mixture A can easily reach up to 40 layers without notable deformation, while all other mixtures deformed noticeably and fell down before the 35th layer. Finally, a large-scale printing was carried out with mixture A and a structure with the height of 80 cm was printed successfully without notable deformation. Density, compressive strength and flexural strength of printed filaments were also characterized. Mechanical performance test results illustrate mixture A has the highest density and appropriate compressive strength, and a relative high flexural strength at different curing ages. These results indicate that Fuller Thompson theory and Marson-Percy model can serve as a reasonable guide for material rheology design for 3DCMP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Review of Additive Manufacturing
Wong, K. V., & Hernandez, A. (2012) · ISRN Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.5402/2012/208760 · Cited by 2,555
Barnes, H. A., Hutton, J. F., & Walters, K. (1989) · Cited by 2,219
Dealy, J. M., & Wissbrun, K. F. (1990) · Melt Rheology and Its Role in Plastics Processing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-9738-4_1 · Cited by 1,370
Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., & Salet, T. (2016) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867 · Cited by 1,257
Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete
Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Materials and Structures · doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z · Cited by 1,218
Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes
Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010 · Cited by 1,205
Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies
Khoshnevis, B. (2004) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012 · Cited by 1,161
Gosselin, C., Duballet, R., Roux, P., Gaudillière, N., Dirrenberger, J., & Morel, P. (2016) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.097 · Cited by 962
Structural built-up of cement-based materials used for 3D-printing extrusion techniques
Perrot, A., Rangeard, D., & Pierre, A. (2016) · Materials and Structures · doi:10.1617/s11527-015-0571-0 · Cited by 959
The Laws of Proportioning Concrete
Fuller, W. B., & Thompson, S. E. (1907) · Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers · doi:10.1061/taceat.0001979 · Cited by 902
Cited by
Large-scale 3D printing concrete technology: Current status and future opportunities
Xiao, J., Ji, G., Zhang, Y., Ma, G., Mechtcherine, V., Pan, J., Wang, L., Ding, T., Duan, Z., & Du, S. (2021) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104115 · Cited by 532
Support Structures for Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Jiang, J., Xu, X., & Stringer, J. (2018) · Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing · doi:10.3390/jmmp2040064 · Cited by 527
Large-scale digital concrete construction – CONPrint3D concept for on-site, monolithic 3D-printing
Mechtcherine, V., Nerella, V. N., Will, F., Näther, M., Otto, J., & Krause, M. (2019) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102933 · Cited by 455
Metadata
- Authors
- Weng, Y., Li, M., Tan, M. J., & Qian, S.
- Venue
- Construction and Building Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 163
- Pages
- 600-610
- ISSN
- 0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2781956876
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 20.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design 3D printing cementitious materials via Fuller Thompson theory and Marson-Percy model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.112
- The paper
- Weng, Y., Li, M., Tan, M. J., & Qian, S. (2018). Design 3D printing cementitious materials via Fuller Thompson theory and Marson-Percy model. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.