Cited by 1,205Innovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesArchitecture and Computational Design

Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes

Open access
Lim, S., Buswell, R.A., Le, T.T., Austin, S.A., Gibb, A.G.F., Thorpe, T.·2012·Automation in Construction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contour crafting is suitable for large-scale object manufacturing, such as a lunar base.

    “The D-shape method uses binder jetting to produce objects, while the contour crafting method uses liquid binder to crystallize materials, making them suitable for large-scale object manufacturing, e.g., lunar base.”
  • The D-shape method uses binder jetting to produce objects.

    “The D-shape method uses binder jetting to produce objects, while the contour crafting method uses liquid binder to crystallize materials, making them suitable for large-scale object manufacturing, e.g., lunar base.”
  • The contour crafting method uses liquid binder to crystallize materials.

    “The D-shape method uses binder jetting to produce objects, while the contour crafting method uses liquid binder to crystallize materials, making them suitable for large-scale object manufacturing, e.g., lunar base.”
  • A variety of 3D printing technologies have been developed using lunar regolith, simulant, and other materials as raw materials, including D-shape, contour crafting, and concrete printing methods.

    “By taking lunar regolith, simulant, and some other materials as the raw materials, a variety of 3D printing technologies have been developed, including but not limited to the D-shape, contour crafting, and concrete printing methods. 63-65”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Lim, S.
Venue
Automation in Construction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
21
Pages
262-268
ISSN
0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093311332
Cited by
1,205
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 125 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 150 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Automation in Construction (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/E002323/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture and Computational Design
Keywords
concrete printing, large-scale 3D printing, architectural elements, building exteriors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review