Cited by 1,257Innovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesArchitecture and Computational Design

Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing

Open access
Bos, Freek, Wolfs, Rob, Ahmed, Zeeshan, Salet, Theo·2016·Virtual and Physical Prototyping

Abstract

Additive manufacturing is gaining ground in the construction industry. The potential to improve on current construction methods is significant. One of such methods being explored currently, both in academia and in construction practice, is the additive manufacturing of concrete (AMoC). Albeit a steadily growing number of researchers and private enterprises active in this field, AMoC is still in its infancy. Different variants in this family of manufacturing methods are being developed and improved continuously. Fundamental scientific understanding of the relations between design, material, process, and product is being explored. The collective body of work in that area is still very limited. After sketching the potential of AMoC for construction, this paper introduces the variants of AMoC under development around the globe and goes on to describe one of these in detail, the 3D Concrete Printing (3DCP) facility of the Eindhoven University of Technology. It is compared to other AMoC methods as well as to 3D printing in general. Subsequently, the paper will address the characteristics of 3DCP product geometry and structure, and discuss issues on parameter relations and experimental research. Finally, it will present the primary obstacles that stand between the potential of 3DCP and large-scale application in practice, and discuss the expected evolution of AMoC in general.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The contour crafting method uses liquid binder to crystallize materials.

    “The D-shape method uses binder jetting to produce objects, while the contour crafting method uses liquid binder to crystallize materials, making them suitable for large-scale object manufacturing, e.g., lunar base.”

    From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

    Section 2.3 (page unavailable) distinguishes the methods: D-Shape deposits powder followed by binder, whereas contour crafting stacks filaments. The claim assigns the binder-based process to contour crafting; the paper assigns it to D-Shape and does not describe crystallization as part of contour crafting. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Contour crafting is suitable for large-scale object manufacturing, such as a lunar base.

    “The D-shape method uses binder jetting to produce objects, while the contour crafting method uses liquid binder to crystallize materials, making them suitable for large-scale object manufacturing, e.g., lunar base.”

    From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

    Section 2.3 describes contour crafting as an approach used for construction-scale printing and says gantry robots are commonly used for large projects. It does not identify a lunar base as a contour-crafting application; the lunar-outpost work appears only in the References, without that connection. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A variety of 3D printing technologies have been developed using lunar regolith, simulant, and other materials as raw materials, including D-shape, contour crafting, and concrete printing methods.

    “By taking lunar regolith, simulant, and some other materials as the raw materials, a variety of 3D printing technologies have been developed, including but not limited to the D-shape, contour crafting, and concrete printing methods. 63-65”

    From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

    Section 2.1 (History; page unavailable) describes contour crafting and D-Shape, and the paper also discusses concrete printing. It does not say that these methods were developed using lunar regolith or simulant as raw materials. Lunar soil appears in a cited work’s title in the References, not as a stated material for the methods listed. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The D-shape method uses binder jetting to produce objects.

    “The D-shape method uses binder jetting to produce objects, while the contour crafting method uses liquid binder to crystallize materials, making them suitable for large-scale object manufacturing, e.g., lunar base.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Khoshnevis, B., et al., 2001. Contour crafting -a layered fabrica- tion technique. Special Issue of IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 8 (3), 33-42.
  2. Kwon, H., 2002. Experimentation and analysis of contour crafting (cc) process using uncured ceramic materials. Dissertation (partial fulfillment). University of Southern California.
  3. Wolfs, 2015. 3D printing of concrete structures. Graduation thesis. Eindhoven University of Technology.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., & Salet, T.
Affiliations
Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Bos, Freek
Venue
Virtual and Physical Prototyping
Published
2016-07-02
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
209-225
ISSN
  • 1745-2759 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2767
OpenAlex
W2503299386
Cited by
1,257
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 155 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 173 · 2023: 162 · 2022: 155 · 2021: 138 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 1
FWCI
66.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Virtual and Physical Prototyping (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Ballast Nedam, BAM Infraconsult bv, Bekaert, Concrete Valley, CRH, Cybe, Saint-Gobain Weber Beamix, SGS Intron, SKKG, Van Wijnen, Verhoeven Timmerfabriek, and Witteveen+Bos [grant number (3D printing of sustainable concrete structures)
  • Ballast Nedam, BAM Infraconsult bv, Bekaert, Concrete Valley, CRH, Cybe, Saint-Gobain Weber Beamix, SGS Intron, SKKG, Van Wijnen, Verhoeven Timmerfabriek, and Witteveen+Bos (3D printing of sustainable concrete structures)
  • Ballast Nedam, BAM Infraconsult bv, Bekaert, Concrete Valley, CRH, Cybe, Saint-Gobain Weber Beamix, SGS Intron, SKKG, Van Wijnen, Verhoeven Timmerfabriek, and Witteveen+Bos [grant number (3D printing of sustainable concrete structures)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture and Computational Design
Keywords
additive manufacturing of concrete, 3D concrete printing, construction industry, 3D printing, product geometry, process parameters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review