Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing
Open accessAbstract
Additive manufacturing is gaining ground in the construction industry. The potential to improve on current construction methods is significant. One of such methods being explored currently, both in academia and in construction practice, is the additive manufacturing of concrete (AMoC). Albeit a steadily growing number of researchers and private enterprises active in this field, AMoC is still in its infancy. Different variants in this family of manufacturing methods are being developed and improved continuously. Fundamental scientific understanding of the relations between design, material, process, and product is being explored. The collective body of work in that area is still very limited. After sketching the potential of AMoC for construction, this paper introduces the variants of AMoC under development around the globe and goes on to describe one of these in detail, the 3D Concrete Printing (3DCP) facility of the Eindhoven University of Technology. It is compared to other AMoC methods as well as to 3D printing in general. Subsequently, the paper will address the characteristics of 3DCP product geometry and structure, and discuss issues on parameter relations and experimental research. Finally, it will present the primary obstacles that stand between the potential of 3DCP and large-scale application in practice, and discuss the expected evolution of AMoC in general.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The contour crafting method uses liquid binder to crystallize materials.
“The D-shape method uses binder jetting to produce objects, while the contour crafting method uses liquid binder to crystallize materials, making them suitable for large-scale object manufacturing, e.g., lunar base.”
From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
Section 2.3 (page unavailable) distinguishes the methods: D-Shape deposits powder followed by binder, whereas contour crafting stacks filaments. The claim assigns the binder-based process to contour crafting; the paper assigns it to D-Shape and does not describe crystallization as part of contour crafting. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredContour crafting is suitable for large-scale object manufacturing, such as a lunar base.
“The D-shape method uses binder jetting to produce objects, while the contour crafting method uses liquid binder to crystallize materials, making them suitable for large-scale object manufacturing, e.g., lunar base.”
From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
Section 2.3 describes contour crafting as an approach used for construction-scale printing and says gantry robots are commonly used for large projects. It does not identify a lunar base as a contour-crafting application; the lunar-outpost work appears only in the References, without that connection. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA variety of 3D printing technologies have been developed using lunar regolith, simulant, and other materials as raw materials, including D-shape, contour crafting, and concrete printing methods.
“By taking lunar regolith, simulant, and some other materials as the raw materials, a variety of 3D printing technologies have been developed, including but not limited to the D-shape, contour crafting, and concrete printing methods. 63-65”
From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
Section 2.1 (History; page unavailable) describes contour crafting and D-Shape, and the paper also discusses concrete printing. It does not say that these methods were developed using lunar regolith or simulant as raw materials. Lunar soil appears in a cited work’s title in the References, not as a stated material for the methods listed. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe D-shape method uses binder jetting to produce objects.
“The D-shape method uses binder jetting to produce objects, while the contour crafting method uses liquid binder to crystallize materials, making them suitable for large-scale object manufacturing, e.g., lunar base.”
From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [64]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete
Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Gibb, A., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Materials and Structures · doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z · Cited by 1,223 · see citing works
Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes
Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010 · Cited by 1,205 · see citing works
Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies
Khoshnevis, B. (2003) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012 · Cited by 1,169 · see citing works
Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete
Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Law, R., Gibb, A., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.12.003 · Cited by 1,026 · see citing works
A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry
Wu, P., Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2016) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.005 · Cited by 1,009 · see citing works
Building components for an outpost on the lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology
Cesaretti, G., Dini, E., De Kestelier, X., Colla, V., & Pambaguian, L. (2014) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.034 · Cited by 806 · see citing works
KIZILKANAT, A. B., Kabay, N., Akyüncü, V., et al. (2015) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.006 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Mega-scale fabrication by Contour Crafting
Khoshnevis, B., Hwang, D., Yao, K. T., & Yeh, Z. (2006) · International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering · doi:10.1504/ijise.2006.009791 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Global Journal of Human-Social Science
(2019) · Global Journal of Human-Social Science · doi:10.34257/gjhss · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Yoo, D., & Yoon, Y. (2016) · International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials · doi:10.1007/s40069-016-0143-x · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced ceramic concrete
Tassew, S. T., & Lubell, A. S. (2013) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.046 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Development of a Viable Concrete Printing Process
Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Le, T., Wackrow, R., Austin, S. A., Gibb, A., & Thorpe, T. (2011) · International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC) · doi:10.22260/isarc2011/0124 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Khoshnevis, B., & Dutton, R. (1998) · Materials Technology · doi:10.1080/10667857.1998.11752766 · Cited by 207 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Developments started in the mid-1990s in California, USA, when Khoshnevis introduced a technique termed Counter Crafting, see Figure 2(a) (Khoshnevis 1998, 2004, Khoshnevis et al .”
MethodUltra High Performance Fibre-Reinforced Concretes-Interim Recommendations
Bjegović, D., Radić, J., Čandrlić, V., et al. (2004) · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Concrete Wall Fabrication by Contour Crafting
Hwang, D., & Khoshnevis, B. (2004) · Proceedings of the ... ISARC · doi:10.22260/isarc2004/0057 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Khoshnevis, B., Russell, R., Kwon, H., & Bukkapatnam, S. (2001) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/100.956812 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Experimental and Numerical Techniques to Characterize Structural Properties of Fresh Concrete
Carlo, T. D., Khoshnevis, B., & Carlson, A. (2013) · doi:10.1115/imece2013-63993 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Potentials And Challenges In 3D Concrete Printing
Salet, T. T., & Wolfs, R. J. M. (2016) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationÖzel, C., & Yücel, K. T. (2012) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-012-0345-8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Toward Development of Self-Compacting No-Slump Concrete Mixtures
Hoornahad, H. (2014) · Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) · doi:10.4233/uuid:431aa99f-f315-4030-838c-b550dff12ddf · Cited by 12 · see citing works
3D printing of sustainable concrete structures
Wolfs, R. J. M., Salet, T. T., & Hendriks, B. (2015) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationAn optimization strategy for 3D concrete printing
Wolfs, R. J. M., & Salet, T. T. (2015) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Khoshnevis, B., et al., 2001. Contour crafting -a layered fabrica- tion technique. Special Issue of IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 8 (3), 33-42.
- Kwon, H., 2002. Experimentation and analysis of contour crafting (cc) process using uncured ceramic materials. Dissertation (partial fulfillment). University of Southern California.
- Wolfs, 2015. 3D printing of concrete structures. Graduation thesis. Eindhoven University of Technology.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Additive manufacturing using mobile robots: Opportunities and challenges for building construction
Dörfler, K., Dielemans, G., Lachmayer, L., Recker, T., Raatz, A., Lowke, D., & Gerke, M. (2022) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106772 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review
Wu, W., Shen, J., Kong, H., Yang, Y., Ren, E., Liu, Z., Wang, W., Dong, M., Han, L., Yang, C., et al. (2024) · The Innovation Energy · doi:10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2024.100029 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., & Salet, T.
- Affiliations
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Bos, Freek
- Venue
- Virtual and Physical Prototyping
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-07-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209-225
- ISSN
- 1745-2759 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-2767
- OpenAlex
- W2503299386
- Cited by
- 1,257
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 155 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 173 · 2023: 162 · 2022: 155 · 2021: 138 · 2020: 151 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 66.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Virtual and Physical Prototyping (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Ballast Nedam, BAM Infraconsult bv, Bekaert, Concrete Valley, CRH, Cybe, Saint-Gobain Weber Beamix, SGS Intron, SKKG, Van Wijnen, Verhoeven Timmerfabriek, and Witteveen+Bos [grant number (3D printing of sustainable concrete structures)
- Ballast Nedam, BAM Infraconsult bv, Bekaert, Concrete Valley, CRH, Cybe, Saint-Gobain Weber Beamix, SGS Intron, SKKG, Van Wijnen, Verhoeven Timmerfabriek, and Witteveen+Bos (3D printing of sustainable concrete structures)
- Ballast Nedam, BAM Infraconsult bv, Bekaert, Concrete Valley, CRH, Cybe, Saint-Gobain Weber Beamix, SGS Intron, SKKG, Van Wijnen, Verhoeven Timmerfabriek, and Witteveen+Bos [grant number (3D printing of sustainable concrete structures)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Architecture and Computational Design
- Keywords
- additive manufacturing of concrete, 3D concrete printing, construction industry, 3D printing, product geometry, process parameters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review