Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

3D-printed steel reinforcement for digital concrete construction – Manufacture, mechanical properties and bond behaviour

Mechtcherine, Viktor, Grafe, Jasmin, Nerella, Venkatesh N., Spaniol, Erik, Hertel, Martin, Füssel, Uwe·2018·Construction and Building Materials

Abstract

Abstract Digital concrete construction has recently become the subject of very rapidly growing research activities all over the world. Various technologies involving 3D-printing with concrete have been developed, and the number of demonstration projects and practical applications has been increasing exponentially. Most of these approaches are focused on the placement of concrete, while the suggested solutions for incorporation of reinforcement are still rudimentary, and as such they lag behind the concepts for printing concrete. Since the use of (steel) reinforcement is mandatory in most structural applications, there is an urgent need to bring the technology of reinforcing 3D-printed structural elements forward. The article starts with a brief overview of the existing approaches in using reinforcement in digital concrete construction. Then the authors’ own research work is presented, namely a feasibility study on 3D-printing of steel reinforcement using gas-metal arc welding. A description of the newly developed 3D-printing process is followed by a demonstration of its feasibility in producing vertical steel reinforcement bars with and without extra ribs. The mechanical performance of the printed bars was investigated by means of uniaxial tension tests. The samples exhibited comparable mechanical properties to common steel reinforcement of the same diameter. The investigation of fracture surfaces confirmed a ductile mode of failure of the printed steel bars. Finally, the bond between printed steel bars and printable fine-grained concrete was tested by means of pull-out experiments. Here the overall performance could be rated as satisfactory, even though it could be improved by introducing extra ribs in the process of bar manufacturing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.202

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Mechtcherine, V., Grafe, J., Nerella, V. N., Spaniol, E., Hertel, M., & Füssel, U.
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
179
Pages
125-137
ISSN
0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807049491
Cited by
332
References
1
FWCI
19.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D-printed steel reinforcement for digital concrete construction – Manufacture, mechanical properties and bond behaviour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.202
The paper
Mechtcherine, V., Grafe, J., Nerella, V. N., Spaniol, E., Hertel, M., & Füssel, U. (2018). 3D-printed steel reinforcement for digital concrete construction – Manufacture, mechanical properties and bond behaviour. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.