Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Yield stress criteria to assess the buildability of 3D concrete printing

Jayathilakage, R., Rajeev, P., Sanjayan, J.G.·2020·Construction and Building Materials

Abstract

Abstract 3D concrete printing (3DCP) using the extrusion method is a commonly used additive manufacturing technique to construct the structures layer by layer without using formwork. Therefore, the green (wet or fresh) strength of the printable concrete determines the possible printable height of the structure and the rate of printing to avoid collapse during the printing process. This paper aims to identify the buildability criteria based on the green strength of concrete and the effect of early age material properties on the stability of printed structures. The commonly available strength-based failure models based on the material yield stress and the vertical stresses induced were developed considering higher aspect ratios (height to width ratio). This may be not suitable for lower aspect ratios used in 3DCP layer geometries. Also, the frictional behaviour due to the applied vertical stresses should be considered in the material used for 3DCP applications. In this work, the Mohr-Coulomb based buildability criterion was developed and validated with laboratory experiments and numerical simulations. The laboratory experiments were carried out to establish the time-dependent material and rheological properties of 3D printable concrete mixes. Further, 3D printing of hollow circular sections was carried out to study the failure modes and to obtain the build height at the time of failure. The nonlinear finite difference model of the 3D printed sections was developed with the user-defined time-dependent material models to assess the accuracy of the proposed buildability criterion. Additionally, the proposed buildability criterion was further validated with the 3DCP experimental and numerical data presented in literature and all confirm that the proposed criterion shows higher accuracy over existing methods in assessing the buildability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117989

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Jayathilakage, R., Rajeev, P., & Sanjayan, J. G.
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
240
Pages
117989
ISSN
0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000333157
Cited by
275
References
2
FWCI
16.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Yield stress criteria to assess the buildability of 3D concrete printing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117989
The paper
Jayathilakage, R., Rajeev, P., & Sanjayan, J. G. (2020). Yield stress criteria to assess the buildability of 3D concrete printing. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117989

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.