Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization

Huang, Jianxin, Kogbara, Reginald B., Hariharan, Narain, Masad, Eyad A., Little, Dallas N.·2021·Construction and Building Materials

Abstract

Abstract This paper provides a review of the research on use of polymers for soil stabilization in pavement and geotechnical engineering. First, the properties impacting the effectiveness of widely used polymer classes, including geopolymers, biopolymers, and synthetic organic polymers are discussed. These include types and ratios of the precursor and activator of geopolymers, molecular weight, particle size, charge, conformation, solubility, viscosity, pH, and moisture behavior of organic polymers. Next, the paper reviews the mechanisms governing stabilization of soils with the various polymer classes. The key mechanisms for organic polymer–clay interactions are electrostatic forces and entropy increase, which contribute differently depending on whether the polymer is cationic, neutral, or anionic. On the other hand, the interactions between polymers and coarse-grained soils composed predominantly of sands are mainly attributed to three types of structural changes: a thin film covering sand particles, the formation of polymer ties connecting noncontacted neighboring particles, and the development of adhesion between particles. The mechanism of geopolymer stabilization is through the formation of a sodium and/or calcium aluminosilicate gel, which bind the surrounding soil particles and harden into a denser, stronger matrix. The engineering properties of the soil types after stabilization using polymers, including strength improvement, permeability reduction, swell and shrinkage inhibition, and durability and stability enhancement are discussed. Finally, the paper highlights the challenges for wider use of polymer stabilization of soils including limited evaluation standards, life-cycle cost considerations, and moisture susceptibility. To this end, some future research direction to promote the widespread use of polymers in soil stabilization are recommended including the need for establishment of standard testing protocols, evaluation of in-situ properties of polymer stabilized soils, resolution of durability issues and further in-depth examination of stabilizing mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124685

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 90 references

Metadata

Authors
Huang, J., Kogbara, R. B., Hariharan, N., Masad, E. A., & Little, D. N.
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
305
Pages
124685
ISSN
0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3197662210
Cited by
304
References
90
FWCI
20.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124685
The paper
Huang, J., Kogbara, R. B., Hariharan, N., Masad, E. A., & Little, D. N. (2021). A state-of-the-art review of polymers used in soil stabilization. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124685

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.