Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting the compressive strength of concrete with fly ash admixture using machine learning algorithms

Open access
Song, Hongwei, Ahmad, Ayaz, Farooq, Furqan, Ostrowski, Krzysztof Adam, Maślak, Mariusz, Czarnecki, Slawomir, Aslam, Fahid·2021·Construction and Building Materials

Abstract

The cementitious composites have different properties in the changing environment. Thus, knowing their mechanical properties is very important for safety reasons. The most important in the case of concrete is the Compressive strength (CS). To predict the CS of concrete Machine learning (ML) approaches has been essential. This study includes the collection of data from the experimental work and the application of ML techniques to predict the CS of concrete containing fly ash. The chemical and physical properties of all the materials used in this study were evaluated. Although, the emphasis of this research is on the use of supervised machine learning algorithms to forecast the CS of concrete. The Gene expression programming (GEP), Artificial neural network (ANN), and Decision tree (DT) algorithms were investigated for the prediction of outcome (CS). Concrete samples (cylinders) with different mix ratios were cast and tested at various ages to maintain the required data for applying it to run the models. Total 98 data points were collected from the experimental approach, in which seven parameters namely cement, fly ash, superplasticizer, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, water, and days were taken as input to predict the output which was CS parameter. The experimental data is further validated by mean of k-fold cross-validation using R2, root mean error (RME), and Root mean square error (RMSE). In addition, statistical checks were incorporated to evaluate the model performance. In comparison, the bagging algorithm shows high accuracy towards the prediction of outcome as indicated by its high coefficient correlation (R2) value equals to 0.95, while R2 value for GEP, ANN and DT comes to 0.86, 0.81 and 0.75 respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125021

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Metadata

Authors
Song, H., Ahmad, A., Farooq, F., Ostrowski, K. A., Maślak, M., Czarnecki, S., & Aslam, F.
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
308
Pages
125021
ISSN
0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3204631755
Cited by
384
References
47
FWCI
31.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting the compressive strength of concrete with fly ash admixture using machine learning algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125021
The paper
Song, H., Ahmad, A., Farooq, F., Ostrowski, K. A., Maślak, M., Czarnecki, S., & Aslam, F. (2021). Predicting the compressive strength of concrete with fly ash admixture using machine learning algorithms. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.