Vigilance impossible: diligence, distraction, and daydreaming all lead to failures in a practical monitoring task
Open accessAbstract
In laboratory studies of vigilance, participants watch for unusual events in a "sit and stare" fashion as their performance typically declines over time. But watch keepers in practical settings seldom approach monitoring in such simplistic ways and controlled environments. We observed airline pilots performing routine monitoring duties in the cockpit. Unlike laboratory studies, pilots' monitoring did not deteriorate amidst prolonged vigils. Monitoring was frequently interrupted by other pop-up tasks and misses followed. However, when free from these distractions, pilots reported copious mind wandering. Pilots often confined their mind wandering to times in which their monitoring performance would not conspicuously suffer. But when no convenient times were available, pilots mind wandered anyway and misses ensued. Real-world monitors may be caught between a continuous vigilance approach that is doomed to fail, a dynamic environment that cannot be fully controlled, and what may be an irresistible urge to let one's thoughts drift.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Guided search is more vulnerable to vigilance decrements and attentional lapses with increasing time on task, number of simultaneous tasks, and operator's mental and physical fatigue.
“Guided search is also more vulnerable to vigilance decrements and attentional lapses, which tend to occur with increasing time on task, the number of simultaneous tasks, and the operator's mental and physical fatigue [9 , 13-18] .”
From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946 · Cited by 2,067 · see citing works
Self-citationAn opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003196 · Cited by 1,381 · see citing works
Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind
Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006 · Cited by 917 · see citing works
Self-citationIntensive Meditation Training Improves Perceptual Discrimination and Sustained Attention
MacLean, K. A., Ferrer, E., Aichele, S. R., Bridwell, D. A., Zanesco, A. P., Jacobs, T. L., King, B. G., Rosenberg, E. L., Sahdra, B. K., Shaver, P. R., et al. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610371339 · Cited by 623 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Less practically, MacLean et al. (2010) have demonstrated the benefits of meditation and mindfulness training on subjects' ability to perform a sustained attention task.”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy
Introzzi, L., Zonca, J., Cabitza, F., Cherubini, P., & Reverberi, C. (2024) · Digestive and Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2023.10.018 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Casner, S. M., & Schooler, J. W.
- Affiliations
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Casner, Stephen M.
- Venue
- Consciousness and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 35
- Pages
- 33-41
- ISSN
- 1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W310492483
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Consciousness and Cognition (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Keywords
- sustained attention, mind wandering, daydreaming, pilot monitoring, vigilance decrement, task interruption, real-world monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Arousal, Attention, Aviation, Fantasy, Humans, Task Performance and Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review