Cited by 917Mind wandering and attentionCognitive Functions and MemoryPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind

Schooler, Jonathan W., Smallwood, Jonathan, Christoff, Kalina, Handy, Todd C., Reichle, Erik D., Sayette, Michael A.·2011·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Mind wandering (i.e. engaging in cognitions unrelated to the current demands of the external environment) reflects the cyclic activity of two core processes: the capacity to disengage attention from perception (known as perceptual decoupling) and the ability to take explicit note of the current contents of consciousness (known as meta-awareness). Research on perceptual decoupling demonstrates that mental events that arise without any external precedent (known as stimulus independent thoughts) often interfere with the online processing of sensory information. Findings regarding meta-awareness reveal that the mind is only intermittently aware of engaging in mind wandering. These basic aspects of mind wandering are considered with respect to the activity of the default network, the role of executive processes, the contributions of meta-awareness and the functionality of mind wandering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 110 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Schooler, Jonathan W.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
319-26
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135840784
Cited by
917
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 21
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
mind wandering, meta-awareness, attentional disengagement, default mode network, executive processes, consciousness, self-monitoring
MeSH terms
Attention, Awareness, Brain, Humans, Memory Disorders, Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review