Cited by 14Ethics in Clinical ResearchCultural Competency in Health CareGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Recruitment practices for U.S. minority and underserved populations in NRG oncology: Results of an online survey

Open access
Cook, Elise D., Yeager, Katherine A., Cecchini, Reena S., Boparai, Jaskaran, Brown, Carol L., Duncan, Martha, Cronin, Walter M., Paskett, Electra D.·2018·Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cancer clinical trials (CCT) provide much of the evidence for clinical guidelines and standards of care. But low levels of CCT participation are well documented, especially for minorities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted an online survey of 556 recruitment practices across the NRG Oncology network. Survey aims were 1) to learn how sites recruit minority/underserved populations; 2) to better understand the catchment areas of the NRG institutions; and 3) to aid in planning education programs for accrual of minority/underserved populations. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 34.9%. The most effective methods reported for recruiting minority/underserved participants were patient navigators (44.4%) and translators (38.9%). All institutions reported using a mechanism for eligibility screening and 71% of institutions reported using a screening/enrollment tracking system. CCT training was required at 78.1% and cultural competency training was required at 47.5% of responding institutions. Only 19.9% of sites used community partners to assist with minority recruitment and just 37.1% of respondents reported a defined catchment area. Sites reported very little race and ethnicity data. CONCLUSION: This NRG Oncology online survey provides useful data for improvements in trial enrollment and training to recruit minority/underserved populations to CCT. Areas for further investigation include web-based methods for recruitment and tracking, cultural competency training, definition of catchment areas, use of patient navigators, and community partnerships. The survey results will guide recruitment training programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.03.003

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Ko N.Y. Fu J.L. Lane S.C. Cancer clinical trial enrollment of diverse and underserved patients within an urban safety net hospital J. Community Support Oncol. 13 2015 429 435 26863873

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, E. D., Yeager, K. A., Cecchini, R. S., Boparai, J., Brown, C. L., Duncan, M., Cronin, W. M., & Paskett, E. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • NRG Oncology (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Cook, Elise D.
Venue
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
10
Pages
100-104
ISSN
2451-8654 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791147947
Cited by
14
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • NCORP (UG1CA189867)
  • NRG Oncology Operations (U10CA180868)
  • NRG Oncology SDMC (U10CA180822)
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
cancer clinical trials, minority recruitment, underserved populations, patient navigators, translators, cultural competence training, eligibility screening, catchment area, community partnerships, recruitment training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review