Cited by 232Ethics in Clinical ResearchCultural Competency in Health CareRace, Genetics, and Society

Culturally Competent Strategies for Recruitment and Retention of African American Populations into Clinical Trials

Open access
Otado, Jane, Kwagyan, John, Edwards, Diana, Ukaegbu, Alice, Rockcliffe, Faun, Osafo, Nana·2015·Clinical and Translational Science

Abstract

Purpose: To identify successful recruitment strategies, challenges and best practices for researchers to engage African American communities in clinical studies taken into consideration target participants’ culture and context. Methods: We reviewed 50 studies conducted from 2001 to 2012 at an inner‐city research center to determine the type, duration, anticipated enrollments and actual enrollments. Survey was sent to study coordinators to obtain data on recruitment and retention strategies, challenges and dropout rates. We also interviewed 25 study coordinators on challenges and strategies. Results: Of the 50 studies, 24 had completed recruitment at the time of this report. The completed studies achieved a median recruitment rate of 88% (range: 50–110). Successful recruitment and retention strategies included: field‐based strategy and snowballing. Major barriers were: distrust, compensation, education disadvantage, lack of interest, and inability to have study partner. Strategies to reduce barriers included providing informational sessions, disseminating newsletters about study outcomes. Best practices include being culturally sensitive including demonstrating a caring attitude and being responsive to participants needs. Conclusions: Cultural competence is critical in order to design and implement successful recruitment strategies in this population. Research teams should consist of multiethnic staff, involve the community, demonstrate trust and deliver concise education of the research endeavor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cts.12285

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recruitment failure can negatively affect the motivation and engagement of stakeholders closely involved with the study, participants, and investigators.

    “Additionally, recruitment failure can negatively affect the motivation and engagement of stakeholders who are closely involved with the study, participants and investigators [8].”

    From Recruitment of low-income pregnant women into a dietary and dental care intervention: lessons from a feasibility trial (2020) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Results section on barriers to recruitment describes participants’ distrust, low compensation, and lack of interest; the Discussion describes strategies associated with successful recruitment. Neither addresses whether recruitment failure reduces the motivation or engagement of stakeholders, participants, or investigators. Searches for those consequences found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [16]Bonham VL National Medical Association National Human Genome Institute Ethical, legal, and social implications: A community view Paper presented at: Symposium on Genomic Medicine Bethesda, MD June 2002
  2. [26]The National Academy of Sciences Informed consent and health literacy: A workshop http://www.iom.edu/Activities/PublicHealth/HealthLiteracy/2014-JUL-28/Panel%201/1Welcome.aspx
  3. [27]Institute of Medicine Roundtable on health literacy: Health literacy past, present and future: A workshop 6 11 2014 Washington, DC

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Otado, J., Kwagyan, J., Edwards, D., Ukaegbu, A., Rockcliffe, F., & Osafo, N.
Affiliations
Howard University (US)
Corresponding author
Otado, Jane
Venue
Clinical and Translational Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-14
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
460-466
ISSN
  • 1752-8054 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-8062
OpenAlex
W2158685593
Cited by
231
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Translational Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (UL1RR031975)
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001409, UL1TR000101)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR031975)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (G12MD007597)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
clinical trial recruitment, participant retention, African American population, cultural competence, community participation, participant dropout, research compensation, study coordinators
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Black or African American, Clinical Trials as Topic, Communication, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Dropouts, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Personnel, Retrospective Studies, United States, Sample Size, Patient Selection, Research Subjects, Cultural Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review