Perspective on reducing errors in research
Open accessAbstract
Efforts to ensure research integrity has mostly focused on research misconduct. However, the complexity of research operations and processes makes research work also prone to unintentional errors. To safeguard against errors and their consequences, strategies for error reduction, detection, and mitigation can be applied to research work. Nurturing a scientific culture that encourages error disclosure and rectification is essential to reduce the negative consequences of errors. Creating repositories where errors can be reported can enable learning from errors and creation of more robust research processes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strategies for reducing errors in science include time-honored quality assurance and quality improvement techniques, such as auditing data, instruments, and systems; validating and testing instruments that analyze or process data; and investigating and analyzing errors.
“Strategies for reducing errors in science include time-honored quality assurance and quality improvement techniques, such as auditing data, instruments, and systems; validating and testing instruments that analyze or process data; and investigating and analyzing errors [1].”
From The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
2 retracted
Aboumatar, H., Naqibuddin, M., Chung, S., Chaudhry, H., Kim, S. W., Saunders, J., Lee, B.-N. R., Gurses, A., Knowlton, A., Pronovost, P., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.17933 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationRetractedAboumatar, H. J., & Wise, R. A. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11954 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationRetractedInstitute of Medicine (2000) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/9728 · Cited by 14,174 · see citing works
To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System
Hendee, W. R. (2001) · Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1016/s1051-0443(01)70072-3 · Cited by 10,122 · see citing works
An Intervention to Decrease Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the ICU
Pronovost, P., Needham, D., Berenholtz, S., Sinopoli, D., Chu, H., Cosgrove, S., Sexton, B., Hyzy, R., Welsh, R., Roth, G., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061115 · Cited by 4,387 · see citing works
Critical incident reporting and learning
Mahajan, R. P. (2010) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeq133 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Nuckols, T. K., Smith-Spangler, C., Morton, S. C., Asch, S. M., Patel, V. M., Anderson, L. J., Deichsel, E. L., & Shekelle, P. G. (2014) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-3-56 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
A Clinical Decision Support System for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism
Durieux, P., Nizard, R., Ravaud, P., Mounier, N., & Lepage, É. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.21.2816 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Reproducible research can still be wrong: Adopting a prevention approach
Leek, J. T., & Peng, R. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1421412111 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Le Berre, M., Maimon, G., Sourial, N., Guériton, M., & Vedel, I. (2017) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.14828 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Resilience and Resilience Engineering in Health Care
Fairbanks, R. J. T., Wears, R. L., Woods, D. D., Hollnagel, E., Plsek, P. E., & Cook, R. I. (2014) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40049-7 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Aboumatar, H., Naqibuddin, M., Chung, S., Chaudhry, H., Kim, S. W., Saunders, J., Lee, B.-N. R., Gurses, A., Knowlton, A., Pronovost, P., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11982 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Self-citationMistake proofing: changing designs to reduce error
Grout, J. R. (2006) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.016030 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
A systematic literature review on strategies to avoid look-alike errors of labels
Larmené‐Beld, K. H. M., Alting, E. K., & Taxis, K. (2018) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00228-018-2471-z · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Correcting the Medical Literature: “To Err Is Human, to Correct Divine”
Christiansen, S. L., & Flanagin, A. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.11833 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Anaesthesia gas supply: Gas cylinders
Srivastava, U. (2013) · Indian Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.4103/0019-5049.120147 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Statistical Code for Clinical Research Papers in a High-Impact Specialist Medical Journal
Assel, M. J., & Vickers, A. J. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m17-2863 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [6]Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ, et al. reportMaking Health Care Safer II: an Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 211. Report for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Report No. 13-E001-EF, March 2013. Rockville: MD.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resnik, D. B., & Hosseini, M. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
“Strategies for reducing errors in science include time-honored quality assurance and quality improvement techniques, such as auditing data, instruments, and systems; validating and testing instruments that analyze or process data; and investigating and analyzing errors [1].”
Error tight: Exercises for lab groups to prevent research mistakes.
Strand, J. F. (2023) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000547 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Chia, R. W., Lee, J., & Cha, J. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134289 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Kovács, M., Varga, M. A., Dianovics, D., Poldrack, R. A., & Aczél, B. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.240844 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
ChatGPT in Scientific Research and Writing: A Beginner’s Guide
Han, J., Qiu, W., & Lichtfouse, É. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-66940-8_1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Challenges Experienced in Conducting Research in the New Normal: Education Student’s Perspectives
Dantic, M. J. P., Gonzales, I. F., Almero, M. E., & Asuncion, A. L. (2024) · European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning · doi:10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(1).03 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Okafor, P.-E., Udosen, A. N., & Igboanugo, B. I. (2025) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00714-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Supporting reanalysis and reuse of clinical trial data: a case study
Burgwinkel, C., Chiam, H. C., Tai, K., Wang, J., Ali, M. H., Fallah, S. S., Matbouriahi, M., Obinwanne, T., Papapostolou, G., Riedha, M., et al. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09646-y · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A Near-Miss in Clinical Outcomes Research Data Collection
Earp, B. E., Benavent, K. A., BLAZAR, P. E., & Zhang, D. (2023) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.23.00267
Scientific corrections of publications by authors affiliated with Chilean institutions
Zahn-Muñoz, C., Niño, B. A., Rojas, E. M., & Quezada, A. M. (2025) · Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication · doi:10.47909/ijsmc.289
Amuli, K., Decabooter, K., Germanes, C., Parys, A. V., Eerens, B., Verschelde, S., Saey, E., Nihoul, M., Moulin, M., Cornu, P., et al. (2026) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-026-14814-6
- Authors
- Aboumatar, H., Thompson, C., Garcia-Morales, E., Gurses, A. P., Naqibuddin, M., Saunders, J., Kim, S. W., & AWise, R.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aboumatar, Hanan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 23
- Pages
- 100838
- ISSN
- 2451-8654 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8390521
- OpenAlex
- W3193672086
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Keywords
- research errors, error reduction, research integrity, research misconduct, error detection, error mitigation, error disclosure, error reporting, scientific culture, learning from mistakes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review