Cited by 11Academic integrity and plagiarismAcademic Publishing and Open AccessResearch Data Management Practices

Perspective on reducing errors in research

Open access
Aboumatar, Hanan, Thompson, Carol, Garcia-Morales, Emmanuel, Gurses, Ayse P., Naqibuddin, Mohammad, Saunders, Jamia, Kim, Samuel W., AWise, Robert·2021·Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications

Abstract

Efforts to ensure research integrity has mostly focused on research misconduct. However, the complexity of research operations and processes makes research work also prone to unintentional errors. To safeguard against errors and their consequences, strategies for error reduction, detection, and mitigation can be applied to research work. Nurturing a scientific culture that encourages error disclosure and rectification is essential to reduce the negative consequences of errors. Creating repositories where errors can be reported can enable learning from errors and creation of more robust research processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100838

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strategies for reducing errors in science include time-honored quality assurance and quality improvement techniques, such as auditing data, instruments, and systems; validating and testing instruments that analyze or process data; and investigating and analyzing errors.

    “Strategies for reducing errors in science include time-honored quality assurance and quality improvement techniques, such as auditing data, instruments, and systems; validating and testing instruments that analyze or process data; and investigating and analyzing errors [1].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ, et al. reportMaking Health Care Safer II: an Updated Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Patient Safety Practices. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 211. Report for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Report No. 13-E001-EF, March 2013. Rockville: MD.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aboumatar, H., Thompson, C., Garcia-Morales, E., Gurses, A. P., Naqibuddin, M., Saunders, J., Kim, S. W., & AWise, R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Aboumatar, Hanan
Venue
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
23
Pages
100838
ISSN
2451-8654 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3193672086
Cited by
11
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
research errors, error reduction, research integrity, research misconduct, error detection, error mitigation, error disclosure, error reporting, scientific culture, learning from mistakes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review