The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contraceptive failure in the United States
Open accessAbstract
This review provides an update of previous estimates of first-year probabilities of contraceptive failure for all methods of contraception available in the United States. Estimates are provided of probabilities of failure during typical use (which includes both incorrect and inconsistent use) and during perfect use (correct and consistent use). The difference between these two probabilities reveals the consequences of imperfect use; it depends both on how unforgiving of imperfect use a method is and on how hard it is to use that method perfectly. These revisions reflect new research on contraceptive failure both during perfect use and during typical use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kaunitz, A. M., Darney, P. D., Ross, D., Wolter, K. D., & Speroff, L. (2009) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2009.02.005 · Cited by 123
Cited by
Saul, J., Bachman, G., Allen, S., Toiv, N. F., Cooney, C., & Beamon, T. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208167 · Cited by 319
Combined oral contraceptives: the risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke
Roach, R. E. J., Helmerhorst, F. M., Lijfering, W. M., Stijnen, T., Algra, A., & Dekkers, O. M. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011054.pub2 · Cited by 299
Raj, A., Ghule, M., Ritter, J., Battala, M., Gajanan, V., Nair, S., Dasgupta, A., Silverman, J. G., Balaiah, D., & Saggurti, N. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153190 · Cited by 131
Perfect-use and typical-use Pearl Index of a contraceptive mobile app
Berglund Scherwitzl, E., Lundberg, O., Kopp Kallner, H., Gemzell Danielsson, K., Trussell, J., & Scherwitzl, R. (2017) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2017.08.014 · Cited by 101
Self-citationCharyeva, Z., Oguntunde, O., Orobaton, N., Otolorin, E., Inuwa, F., Alalade, O., Abegunde, D., & Danladi, S. (2015) · Global Health: Science and Practice · doi:10.9745/ghsp-d-15-00129 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Trussell, J.
- Venue
- Contraception
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 397-404
- ISSN
- 0010-7824 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163114984
- Cited by
- 1,588
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 91.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contraceptive failure in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021
- The paper
- Trussell, J. (2011). Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
