The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metabolic potential of endophytic bacteria
Open accessAbstract
The bacterial endophytic microbiome promotes plant growth and health and beneficial effects are in many cases mediated and characterized by metabolic interactions. Recent advances have been made in regard to metabolite production by plant microsymbionts showing that they may produce a range of different types of metabolites. These substances play a role in defense and competition, but may also be needed for specific interaction and communication with the plant host. Furthermore, few examples of bilateral metabolite production are known and endophytes may modulate plant metabolite synthesis as well. We have just started to understand such metabolic interactions between plants and endophytes, however, further research is needed to more efficiently make use of beneficial plant-microbe interactions and to reduce pathogen infestation as well as to reveal novel bioactive substances of commercial interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
Compant, S., Clément, C., & Sessitsch, A. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024 · Cited by 2,318
Self-citationImaging mass spectrometry in microbiology
Watrous, J. D., & Dorrestein, P. C. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2634 · Cited by 338
Cited by
Multifaceted Interactions Between Endophytes and Plant: Developments and Prospects
Khare, E., Mishra, J., & Arora, N. K. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02732 · Cited by 659
Ecology and Genomic Insights into Plant-Pathogenic and Plant-Nonpathogenic Endophytes
Brader, G., Compant, S., Vescio, K., Mitter, B., Trognitz, F., Ma, L.-J., & Sessitsch, A. (2017) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035641 · Cited by 482
Self-citationTransmission of Bacterial Endophytes
Frank, A., Saldierna Guzmán, J., & Shay, J. (2017) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms5040070 · Cited by 478
Shahzad, R., Khan, A. L., Bilal, S., Waqas, M., Kang, S.-M., & Lee, I.-J. (2017) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.01.010 · Cited by 367
Scarcella, A. S. D. A., Bizarria Junior, R., Bastos, R. G., & Magri, M. M. R. (2017) · Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1590/0104-6632.20170342s20150541 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Brader, G., Compant, S., Mitter, B., Trognitz, F., & Sessitsch, A.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 30-37
- ISSN
- 0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088024461
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic potential of endophytic bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.09.012
- The paper
- Brader, G., Compant, S., Mitter, B., Trognitz, F., & Sessitsch, A. (2014). Metabolic potential of endophytic bacteria. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.09.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
