Cited by 277Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Cognition in harsh and unpredictable environments

Open access
Frankenhuis, Willem E, Panchanathan, Karthik, Nettle, Daniel·2016·Current Opinion in Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.011

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiences of scarcity affect people's cognitive resources.

    “Behavioral science, psychology, and evolutionary biology studies have shown how experiences of scarcity (sometimes referred to as harshness) affect people's cognitive resources (Frankenhuis, Panchanathan, and Nettle 2016; Mani et al. 2013; Mittal et al. 2015).”

    From Human Capital and Administrative Burden: The Role of Cognitive Resources in Citizen‐State Interactions (2020) · cites this paper as Frankenhuis, Panchanathan, and Nettle 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frankenhuis, W. E., Panchanathan, K., & Nettle, D.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Frankenhuis, Willem E
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
7
Pages
76-80
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1443585338
Cited by
277
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 9
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.155.195)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
present orientation, impulsivity, delay of gratification, future discounting, sustained attention, stress, evolutionary psychology, developmental psychology, threat processing, environmental cues, child development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review