Cited by 102Visual perception and processing mechanismsHallucinations in medical conditionsSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

Selective deficit of mental visual imagery with intact primary visual cortex and visual perception

Moro, Valentina, Berlucchi, Giovanni, Lerch, Jason, Tomaiuolo, Francesco, Aglioti, Salvatore M.·2008·Cortex

Abstract

There is a vigorous debate as to whether visual perception and imagery share the same neuronal networks, whether the primary visual cortex is necessarily involved in visual imagery, and whether visual imagery functions are lateralized in the brain. Two patients with brain damage from closed head injury were submitted to tests of mental imagery in the visual, tactile, auditory, gustatory, olfactory and motor domains, as well as to an extensive testing of cognitive functions. A computerized mapping procedure was used to localize the site and to assess the extent of the lesions. One patient showed pure visual mental imagery deficits in the absence of imagery deficits in other sensory domains as well as in the motor domain, while the other patient showed both visual and tactile imagery deficits. Perceptual, language, and memory deficits were conspicuously absent. Computerized analysis of the lesions showed a massive involvement of the left temporal lobe in both patients and a bilateral parietal lesion in one patient. In both patients the calcarine cortex with the primary visual area was bilaterally intact. Our study indicates that: (i) visual imagery deficits can occur independently from deficits of visual perception; (ii) visual imagery deficits can occur when the primary visual cortex is intact and (iii) the left temporal lobe plays an important role in visual mental imagery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2006.06.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moro, V., Berlucchi, G., Lerch, J., Tomaiuolo, F., & Aglioti, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
Corresponding author
Moro, Valentina
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
109-118
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132016240
Cited by
102
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Keywords
visual imagery, visual perception, primary visual cortex, calcarine cortex, left temporal lobe, parietal lobe lesions, closed head injury, brain damage
MeSH terms
Adult, Aphasia, Brain Mapping, Color, Female, Humans, Imagination, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Touch, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Glasgow Coma Scale, Head Injuries, Closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review