Cited by 25Neural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Brain state-dependent recruitment of high-frequency oscillations in the human hippocampus

Open access
Billeke, Pablo, Ossandon, Tomas, Stockle, Marcelo, Perrone-Bertolotti, Marcela, Kahane, Philippe, Lachaux, Jean-Philippe, Fuentealba, Pablo·2017·Cortex

Abstract

Ripples are high-frequency bouts of coordinated hippocampal activity believed to be crucial for information transfer and memory formation. We used intracortical macroelectrodes to record neural activity in the human hippocampus of awake subjects undergoing surgical treatment for refractory epilepsy and distinguished two populations of ripple episodes based on their frequency spectrum. The phase-coupling of one population, slow ripples (90-110 Hz), to cortical delta oscillations was differentially modulated by cognitive task; whereas the second population, fast ripples (130-170 Hz), was not seemingly correlated to local neural activity. Furthermore, as cognitive tasks changed, the ongoing coordination of neural activity associated to slow ripples progressively augmented along the parahippocampal axis. Thus, during resting states, slow ripples were coordinated in restricted hippocampal territories; whereas during active states, such as attentionally-demanding tasks, high frequency activity emerged across the hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex, that was synchronized with slow ripples, consistent with ripples supporting information transfer and coupling anatomically distant regions. Hence, our results provide further evidence of neural diversity in hippocampal high-frequency oscillations and their association to cognitive processing in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.002

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Noncognitivist theories of consciousness should generally predict no changes in ongoing perceptual experience following PFC stimulation, except to the extent that PFC activation affects arousal level or other enabling conditions of conscious experience.

    “Noncognitivist theories of consciousness (e.g., recurrent activation theories) (Silvanto et al., 2005;Lamme, 2014;Billeke et al., 2017) should generally predict no changes in ongoing perceptual experience following PFC stimulation, except to the extent that PFC activation affects arousal level or other enabling conditions of conscious experience.”
  • First-order recurrent activation theories argue that the PFC is neither necessary nor sufficient for consciousness, but rather that conscious contents are determined locally in sensory systems.

    “These theorists argue that the PFC is neither necessary nor sufficient for consciousness, but rather that conscious contents are determined locally in sensory systems.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Billeke, P., Ossandon, T., Stockle, M., Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Kahane, P., Lachaux, J.-P., & Fuentealba, P.
Affiliations
  • Universidad del Desarrollo (CL)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Fuentealba, Pablo
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
94
Pages
87-99
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2715000368
Cited by
25
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • CONICYT
  • FONDECYT (1141089, 1140996)
  • ECOS/CONICYT (C15S01, C12S03, ACT1414)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
hippocampal ripples, high-frequency oscillations, fast ripples, phase coupling, parahippocampal cortex, brain states, memory formation, information transmission, drug-resistant epilepsy, human hippocampus
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review