The impact of spelling regularity on handwriting production: A coupled fMRI and kinematics study
Open accessAbstract
Current models of writing assume that the orthographic processes involved in spelling retrieval and the motor processes involved in the control of the hand are independent. This view has been challenged by behavioral studies, which showed that the linguistic features of words impact motor execution during handwriting. We designed an experiment coupling functional magnetic resonance imaging and kinematic recordings during a writing to dictation task. Participants wrote orthographically regular and irregular words. The presence of an irregularity impacts both the initiation of the movement and its fine motor execution. At the brain level, the left inferior frontal and fusiform gyri, two regions belonging to the core of the written language system, were found to be sensitive to the presence of an irregularity and to its position in the word during writing execution. Moreover, the left superior parietal lobule, the left superior frontal gyrus and the right cerebellum, three motor-related regions, displayed a stronger response to irregular than regular words. These results constitute direct evidence that orthographic and motor processes occur in a continuous and interactive fashion during writing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Palmis et al. found that writing irregular words activated motor-related regions such as the superior frontal gyrus and cerebellum more than regular words.
“Palmis et al. [23] found that writing irregular words activated motor-related regions, such as the superior frontal gyrus and cerebellum, more than regular words, indicating that greater cognitive effort during handwriting might be a key driver of its memory benefits.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
Handwriting facilitates greater multisensory integration involving motor, parietal, and language-related cortical regions.
“Studies by Longcamp et al. [22] and Palmis et al. [23] demonstrate that handwriting facilitates greater multisensory integration involving motor, parietal, and language-related cortical regions.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade.
McClelland, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.4.287 · Cited by 1,298 · see citing works
Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex
Fedorenko, E., Duncan, J., & Kanwisher, N. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1315235110 · Cited by 952 · see citing works
Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain
Fedorenko, E., Behr, M. K., & Kanwisher, N. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1112937108 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle?
Marano, G., Kotzalidis, G. D., Lisci, F. M., Anesini, M. B., Rossi, S., Barbonetti, S., Cangini, A., Ronsisvalle, A., Artuso, L., Falsini, C., et al. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15030345 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Palmis, S., Velay, J.-L., Fabiani, E., Nazarian, B., Anton, J.-L., Habib, M., Kandel, S., & Longcamp, M.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Palmis, Sarah
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 113
- Pages
- 111-127
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2904728462
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cortex (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Aix-Marseille Université
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- handwriting, orthographic processing, dictation writing, movement initiation, kinematics, inferior frontal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, superior parietal lobule, cerebellum
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Handwriting, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review