Cited by 955Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Broad domain generality in focal regions of frontal and parietal cortex

Open access
Fedorenko, Evelina, Duncan, John, Kanwisher, Nancy·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: One of the oldest debates in cognitive neuroscience concerns the degree of functional specialization present in the human brain. Prior work has discovered several highly specialized components dedicated to particular mental functions, like face recognition or motion perception. However, our cognitive versatility suggests the additional existence of more general-purpose machinery. Building on prior neuroimaging evidence, along with neurophysiological evidence from non-human primates, we searched for such domain-general brain regions in humans. Seven diverse demanding cognitive tasks produced overlapping activation at the individual-subject level in a number of frontal and parietal brain regions. Thus, human cognition arises from hardware that includes not only specialized components, but also very general-purpose ones that plausibly enable us to solve novel problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1315235110

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The FPN and CON are functionally separable brain networks that enable flexible adaptive control and sustained task-set maintenance; together, they form the MD network, a set of brain regions that is active during a range of tasks that require goal-directed behavior.

    “The FPN and CON are functionally separable brain networks that enable flexible adaptive control and sustained task-set maintenance [142]; together, they form the MD network [143], a set of brain regions that is active during a range of tasks that require goal-directed behavior [139].”

    From The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2022) · cites this paper as [139]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Conjunction maps of activation during different tasks suggest that both children and adults recruit a common set of regions within the FPN and CON during diverse EF tasks.

    “Conjunction maps of activation during different tasks (e.g., during inhibiting, updating, and shifting tasks), either with data estimated within one study [135, 138, 139] or with meta-analytic techniques [137, 140, 141], suggest that both children and adults recruit a common set of regions within the FPN and CON during diverse EF tasks.”

    From The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function (2022) · cites this paper as [139]

    The Results and Discussion (pages unavailable) report overlapping activation across diverse demanding tasks in frontal and parietal multiple-demand regions, supporting the adult task-overlap portion of the claim. Materials and Methods states that participants were 18–50 years old, so this study does not establish the claim for children. The Results also describe anterior/mid-cingulate activation in only some tasks, rather than establishing common recruitment of the entire CON. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Brain regions engaged in a verbal WM task, associated with the MD network, are also engaged during spatial and imitative conflict resolution.

    “Our findings show that brain regions that are engaged in a verbal WM task, which are associated with the operation of the MD network (Fedorenko et al., 2013;Duncan, 2010), are also engaged during spatial and imitative conflict resolution.”
  • The hard > easy contrast in the verbal working memory task has been found to robustly activate regions of the MD network.

    “The hard > easy contrast has been found to robustly activate regions of the MD network (Fedorenko et al., 2011(Fedorenko et al., , 2013)).”
  • These same domain-independent regions are activated during a variety of different cognitive and motor control tasks.

    “In addition to the connectional anatomy, it has been noted that these same domain-independent regions are activated during a variety of different cognitive and motor control tasks [70, 71].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [29]29. Blumstein S, Amso D (2013) Neural plasticity and dynamic functional organization: Insights from functional neuroimaging. Perspect Psychol Sci 8(1):44-48.
  2. [67]67. Hampshire A, Highfield RR, Parkin BL, Owen AM (2012) Fractionating human in- telligence. Neuron 76(6):1225-1237.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fedorenko, E., Duncan, J., & Kanwisher, N.
Affiliations
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-09-23
Volume
110
Issue
41
Pages
16616-16621
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2001896589
Cited by
952
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 2
FWCI
23.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (057522, 0904625)
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • National Institutes of Health (5k99hd057522-02)
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY013455)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K99 HD-057522)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
domain generality, domain specificity, frontal cortex, parietal cortex, cognitive flexibility, arithmetic, working memory, cognitive inhibition, single-subject analysis, functional topography
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review