Cited by 119Visual perception and processing mechanismsCognitive Abilities and TestingMemory Processes and Influences

Visual working memory in aphantasia: Retained accuracy and capacity with a different strategy

Keogh, Rebecca, Wicken, Marcus, Pearson, Joel·2021·Cortex

Abstract

Visual working memory paradigms involve retaining and manipulating visual information in mind over a period of seconds. Evidence suggests that visual imagery (sensory recruitment) is a strategy used by many to retain visual information during such tasks, leading some researchers to propose that visual imagery and visual working memory may be one and the same. If visual imagery is essential to visual working memory task performance there should be large ramifications for a special population of individuals who do not experience visual imagery, aphantasia. Here we assessed visual working memory task performance in this population using a number of different lab and clinical working memory tasks. We found no differences in capacity limits for visual, general number or spatial working memory for aphantasic individuals compared to controls. Further, aphantasic individuals showed no significant differences in performance on visual components of clinical working memory tests as compared to verbal components. However, there were significant differences in the reported strategies used by aphantasic individuals across all memory tasks. Additionally, aphantasic individual's visual memory accuracy did not demonstrate a significant oblique orientation effect, which is proposed to occur due to sensory recruitment, further supporting their non-visual imagery strategy reports. Taken together these data demonstrate that aphantasic individuals are not impaired on visual working memory tasks, s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.07.012

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On standard experimental measures of memory, people with aphantasia perform normally or show at most mild to moderate impairment.

    “On a range of standard experimental measures of memory (short- and long-term, verbal and visual), people with aphantasia perform normally or show, at most, mild to moderate impairment”
  • People with aphantasia use alternative strategies in tasks that are performed using imagery by people to whom this is available.

    “people with aphantasia use alternative strategies in tasks that are performed using imagery by people to whom this is available [49”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keogh, R., Wicken, M., & Pearson, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Keogh, Rebecca
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
143
Pages
237-253
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3192107546
Cited by
119
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (DP140101560)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1024800, APP1046198, APP1049596, APP1085404)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
aphantasia, visual working memory, visual imagery, working memory capacity, memory accuracy, oblique effect, spatial working memory, memory strategies
MeSH terms
Humans, Imagination, Memory, Short-Term, Visual Perception, Imagery, Psychotherapy, Spatial Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review