Cited by 41Visual perception and processing mechanismsHallucinations in medical conditionsMemory Processes and Influences

Diversity of aphantasia revealed by multiple assessments of visual imagery, multisensory imagery, and cognitive style

Open access
Takahashi, Junichi, Saito, Godai, Omura, Kazufumi, Yasunaga, Daichi, Sugimura, Shinichiro, Sakamoto, Shuichi, Horikawa, Tomoyasu, Gyoba, Jiro·2023·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Aphantasia—a condition wherein individuals have a reduced or absent construction of voluntary visual imagery—is diagnosed using either the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ) or self-identification. However, a significant discrepancy exists between the proportions of aphantasia in the populations assessed using these two criteria. It is unclear why the reported proportions differ excessively and what percentage of people cannot form visual imagery. We investigated the replicability of the proportion of people with aphantasia using both criteria in the same population of participants. Therefore, we explored the potential causes of the discrepancy and characteristics of putative aphantasia in terms of multisensory imagery, cognitive style, and face recognition ability. First, we conducted an online sampling study (Study 1: N = 2,871) using the VVIQ, self-identification of a reduction in visual imagery, Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery (QMI), and Verbalizer-Visualizer Questionnaire (VVQ). We found that 3.7 and 12.1% fulfilled the VVIQ and self-identification criteria, respectively, roughly replicating the proportions reported in previous studies. The self-identification criterion—but not the VVIQ criterion—contains items related to face recognition; hence, we suspected that face recognition ability was factor contributing to this discrepancy and conducted another online sampling study (Study 2: N = 774). We found a significant correlation between VVIQ and face recognition ability in the control group with self-identification, but not in the group defined by low VVIQ (VVIQ ≤32). As the participants in the control group with self-identification tended to exhibit moderately high VVIQ scores but low face recognition ability, we reason that the discrepancy can be partially explained by the contamination of individual differences in face recognition ability. Additional analyses of Study 1 revealed that the aphantasia group included participants who lacked all types of sensory imagery or only visual imagery in multisensory imagery and exhibited a non-specific cognitive style. This study indicates that the VVIQ alone may be insufficient to diagnose individuals who report an inability to form visual imagery. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of multiple assessments—along with the VVIQ—to better understand the diversity of imagery in aphantasia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174873

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Around 1% of the population experiences profound aphantasia, with the lowest possible VVIQ score (16/80).

    “These studies suggest that ~1% of the population experiences profound aphantasia and have the lowest possible VVIQ score (16/80)”

    From Aphantasia and hyperphantasia: exploring imagery vividness extremes (2024) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Introduction reports a previous study's estimate of 0.8% for people with a complete lack of visual imagery and a VVIQ score of 16, supporting the approximate 1% figure. But this paper's Study 1 Results found only 0.07% at that score and explicitly noted that its estimate was lower, so the claim does not reflect this paper's own finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • 2-6% of the population experiences imagery that is at best 'vague and dim', with VVIQ scores of 32/80 or less.

    “whereas 2–6% experience imagery that is at best 'vague and dim', and have VVIQ scores of 32/80 or less”

    From Aphantasia and hyperphantasia: exploring imagery vividness extremes (2024) · cites this paper as [36]

    Study 1’s Results and discussion report that 3.7% of participants scored 16–32 on the VVIQ; Study 2 reports 2.6%, both within the claimed range. The paper does not give 2–6% as a population estimate. Its Introduction distinguishes the VVIQ threshold from a separate study’s “vague and dim” self-description, so the claim also conflates two measures. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • People with aphantasia show increased scores on a prosopagnosia questionnaire.

    “This is reflected in increased scores on a prosopagnosia questionnaire [36”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takahashi, J., Saito, G., Omura, K., Yasunaga, D., Sugimura, S., Sakamoto, S., Horikawa, T., & Gyoba, J.
Affiliations
  • Fukushima University (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Yamagata University (JP)
  • Kanazawa University (JP)
  • Hiroshima University (JP)
  • NTT (Japan) (JP)
  • Shokei Gakuin University (JP)
Corresponding author
Takahashi, Junichi
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2023-07-18
Volume
14
Pages
1174873-1174873
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384692359
Cited by
41
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Casio Science Promotion Foundation
  • Fukushima University
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23K25164)
  • Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
aphantasia, visual imagery, Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire, self-identification, face recognition (cognition), multisensory imagery, cognitive style

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review