The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A cybersecurity framework to identify malicious edge device in fog computing and cloud-of-things environments
Open accessAbstract
Device security is one of the major challenges for successful implementation of Internet of Things and fog computing environment in current IT space. Researchers and Information Technology (IT) organizations have explored many solutions to protect systems from unauthenticated device attacks (known as outside device attacks). Fog computing uses network devices (e.g. router, switch and hub) for latency-aware processing of collected data using IoT. Then, identification of malicious edge device is one of the critical activities in data security of fog computing environment. Preventing attacks from malicious edge devices in fog computing environment is more difficult because they have certain granted privileges to use and process the data. In this paper, proposed cybersecurity framework uses three technologies which are Markov model, Intrusion Detection System (IDS) and Virtual Honeypot Device (VHD) to identify malicious edge device in fog computing environment. A two-stage hidden Markov model is used to effectively categorize edge devices in four different levels. VHD is designed to store and maintain log repository of all identified malicious devices which assists the system to defend itself from any unknown attacks in the future. Proposed cybersecurity framework is tested with real attacks in virtual environment created using OpenStack and Microsoft Azure. Results indicated that proposed cybersecurity framework is successful in identifying the malicious device as well as reducing the false IDS alarm rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fog computing and its role in the internet of things
Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., & Addepalli, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing · doi:10.1145/2342509.2342513 · Cited by 6,244
The Fog Computing Paradigm: Scenarios and Security Issues
Stojmenovic, I., & Wen, S. (2014) · Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.15439/2014f503 · Cited by 1,037
The hierarchical hidden Markov model: Analysis and applications
Fine, S., Singer, Y., & Tishby, N. (1998) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007469218079 · Cited by 906
Human factors in information security: The insider threat – Who can you trust these days?
Colwill, C. (2009) · Information Security Technical Report · doi:10.1016/j.istr.2010.04.004 · Cited by 319
Predd, J., Pfleeger, S. L., Hunker, J., & Bulford, C. (2008) · IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.87 · Cited by 79
Cited by
Khan, W. Z., Ahmed, E., Hakak, S., Yaqoob, I., & Ahmed, A. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.02.050 · Cited by 1,157
IoT Privacy and Security: Challenges and Solutions
Tawalbeh, L., Muheidat, F., Tawalbeh, M., & Quwaider, M. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10124102 · Cited by 764
Ahmad, S., Shakeel, I., Mehfuz, S., & Ahmad, J. (2023) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100568 · Cited by 197
A New Threat Intelligence Scheme for Safeguarding Industry 4.0 Systems
Moustafa, N., Adi, E., Turnbull, B., & Hu, J. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2844794 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Sohal, A. S., Sandhu, R., Sood, S. K., & Chang, V.
- Venue
- Computers & Security
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 74
- Pages
- 340-354
- ISSN
- 0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2754764339
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A cybersecurity framework to identify malicious edge device in fog computing and cloud-of-things environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cose.2017.08.016
- The paper
- Sohal, A. S., Sandhu, R., Sood, S. K., & Chang, V. (2018). A cybersecurity framework to identify malicious edge device in fog computing and cloud-of-things environments. Computers & Security. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2017.08.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.