Cited by 319Information and Cyber SecurityPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionUser Authentication and Security Systems

Human factors in information security: The insider threat – Who can you trust these days?

Colwill, Carl·2009·Information Security Technical Report

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.istr.2010.04.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Well maintained policy and organisational procedures help to mitigate and significantly lower the risk of a potential semantic exploit occurring, without relying on the technical capabilities of users.

    “Designed at lowering exposure to semantic attacks, well maintained policy and organisational procedures help to mitigate and significantly lower the risk of a potential exploit occurring, without relying on the technical capabilities of users [Mitnick and Simon 2001; Hinson 2008; Colwill 2009].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colwill, C.
Affiliations
BT Group (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Colwill, Carl
Venue
Information Security Technical Report
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
186-196
ISSN
1363-4127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083829472
Cited by
319
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 9
FWCI
19.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Security Technical Report (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
Keywords
insider threats, information security, human factors, trust, loyalty and betrayal, outsourcing, security risk management, security risk assessment, compliance, employee behavior, security awareness, third-party security, organizational culture, economic uncertainty, BT

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review