The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Survey of machine learning techniques for malware analysis
Open accessAbstract
Coping with malware is getting more and more challenging, given their relentless growth in complexity and volume. One of the most common approaches in literature is using machine learning techniques, to automatically learn models and patterns behind such complexity, and to develop technologies for keeping pace with the speed of development of novel malware. This survey aims at providing an overview on the way machine learning has been used so far in the context of malware analysis. We systematize surveyed papers according to their objectives (i.e., the expected output, what the analysis aims to), what information about malware they specifically use (i.e., the features), and what machine learning techniques they employ (i.e., what algorithm is used to process the input and produce the output). We also outline a number of problems concerning the datasets used in considered works, and finally introduce the novel concept of malware analysis economics, regarding the study of existing tradeoffs among key metrics, such as analysis accuracy and economical costs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Introduction to information retrieval
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2715 · Cited by 12,278
Cited by
Explainable Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cyber Security: State-of-the-Art in Research
Zhang, Z., Hamadi, H. A., Damiani, E., Yeun, C. Y., & Taher, F. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204051 · Cited by 450
Performance Comparison and Current Challenges of Using Machine Learning Techniques in Cybersecurity
Shaukat, K., Luo, S., Varadharajan, V., Hameed, I., Chen, S., Liu, D., & Li, J. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13102509 · Cited by 303
The Role of Machine Learning in Cybersecurity
Apruzzese, G., Laskov, P., Montes de Oca, E., Mallouli, W., Brdalo Rapa, L., Grammatopoulos, A. V., & Di Franco, F. (2023) · Digital Threats: Research and Practice · doi:10.1145/3545574 · Cited by 279
Artificial Intelligence Security: Threats and Countermeasures
Hu, Y., Kuang, W., Qin, Z., Li, K., Zhang, J., Gao, Y., Li, W., & Li, K. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3487890 · Cited by 196
Machine Learning in IoT Security: Current Solutions and Future Challenges
Hussain, F., Hussain, R., Hassan, S. A., & Hossain, E. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2986444 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Ucci, D., Aniello, L., & Baldoni, R.
- Venue
- Computers & Security
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 81
- Pages
- 123-147
- ISSN
- 0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900633536
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survey of machine learning techniques for malware analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cose.2018.11.001
- The paper
- Ucci, D., Aniello, L., & Baldoni, R. (2019). Survey of machine learning techniques for malware analysis. Computers & Security. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2018.11.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.