The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance Comparison and Current Challenges of Using Machine Learning Techniques in Cybersecurity
Open accessAbstract
Cyberspace has become an indispensable factor for all areas of the modern world. The world is becoming more and more dependent on the internet for everyday living. The increasing dependency on the internet has also widened the risks of malicious threats. On account of growing cybersecurity risks, cybersecurity has become the most pivotal element in the cyber world to battle against all cyber threats, attacks, and frauds. The expanding cyberspace is highly exposed to the intensifying possibility of being attacked by interminable cyber threats. The objective of this survey is to bestow a brief review of different machine learning (ML) techniques to get to the bottom of all the developments made in detection methods for potential cybersecurity risks. These cybersecurity risk detection methods mainly comprise of fraud detection, intrusion detection, spam detection, and malware detection. In this review paper, we build upon the existing literature of applications of ML models in cybersecurity and provide a comprehensive review of ML techniques in cybersecurity. To the best of our knowledge, we have made the first attempt to give a comparison of the time complexity of commonly used ML models in cybersecurity. We have comprehensively compared each classifier’s performance based on frequently used datasets and sub-domains of cyber threats. This work also provides a brief introduction of machine learning models besides commonly used security datasets. Despite having all the primary precedence, cybersecurity has its constraints compromises, and challenges. This work also expounds on the enormous current challenges and limitations faced during the application of machine learning techniques in cybersecurity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
(2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5 · Cited by 25,437
A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition
Burges, C. J. C. (1998) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1023/a:1009715923555 · Cited by 16,429
Recent advances in convolutional neural networks
Gu, J., Wang, Z., Kuen, J., Ma, L., Shahroudy, A., Shuai, B., Liu, T., Wang, X., Wang, G., Cai, J., et al. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 · Cited by 6,576
A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set
Tavallaee, M., Bagheri, E., Lu, W., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications · doi:10.1109/cisda.2009.5356528 · Cited by 5,396
Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (2002) · Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.1995.380415 · Cited by 5,155
Artificial neural networks: a tutorial
Jain, A. K., Mao, J., & Mohiuddin, K. M. (1996) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.485891 · Cited by 4,946
(2010) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/1756006.1953039 · Cited by 4,051
Deep Learning: Methods and Applications
Deng, L., & Yu, D. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing · doi:10.1561/2000000039 · Cited by 3,480
A Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection
Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2494502 · Cited by 3,332 · cited 14×
“On the DARPA dataset, NB and ANN performed better accuracy than other models, but ANN has given worse precision value on DARPA dataset.”
InfluentialDeep Learning Approach for Intelligent Intrusion Detection System
Vinayakumar, R., Alazab, M., Soman, K. P., Poornachandran, P., Al-Nemrat, A., & Venkatraman, S. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2895334 · Cited by 1,946
Cited by
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in CyberSecurity: A Survey
Capuano, N., Fenza, G., Loia, V., & Stanzione, C. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204171 · Cited by 330
“Shaukat et al. [52] examined the performance of various ML algorithms in terms of time complexity for identifying Cyber-attacks.”
BackgroundCollaborative Learning Based Sybil Attack Detection in Vehicular AD-HOC Networks (VANETS)
Azam, S., Bibi, M., Riaz, R., Rizvi, S. S., & Kwon, S. J. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22186934 · Cited by 66
One-Class Anomaly Detection for Industrial Applications: A Comparative Survey and Experimental Study
Paolini, D., Dini, P., Soldaini, E., & Saponara, S. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14070281 · Cited by 21
Heuristic Intrusion Detection Based on Traffic Flow Statistical Analysis
Szczepanik, W., & Niemiec, M. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15113951 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Shaukat, K., Luo, S., Varadharajan, V., Hameed, I., Chen, S., Liu, D., & Li, J.
- Venue
- Energies
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-05-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2509
- ISSN
- 1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3025204993
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 110
- FWCI
- 18.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance Comparison and Current Challenges of Using Machine Learning Techniques in Cybersecurity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/en13102509
- The paper
- Shaukat, K., Luo, S., Varadharajan, V., Hameed, I., Chen, S., Liu, D., & Li, J. (2020). Performance Comparison and Current Challenges of Using Machine Learning Techniques in Cybersecurity. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102509
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.