Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A deep learning method with wrapper based feature extraction for wireless intrusion detection system

Kasongo, Sydney Mambwe, Sun, Yanxia·2020·Computers & Security

Abstract

Abstract In the past decade, wired and wireless computer networks have substantially evolved because of the rapid development of technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), wireless handled devices, vehicular networks, 4G and 5G, cyber-physical systems, etc. These technologies exchange large amount of data, and as a result, they are prone to several malicious actions, attacks and security threats that can compromise the availability and integrity of information or services. Therefore, the security and protection of the various communication infrastructures using an intrusion detection system (IDS) is of critical importance. In this research, we propose a Feed-Forward Deep Neural Network (FFDNN) wireless IDS system using a Wrapper Based Feature Extraction Unit (WFEU). The extraction method of the WFEU uses the Extra Trees algorithm in order to generate a reduced optimal feature vector. The effectiveness and efficiency of the WFEU-FFDNN is studied based on the UNSW-NB15 and the AWID intrusion detection datasets. Furthermore, the WFEU-FFDNN is compared to standard machine learning (ML) algorithms that include Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT) and k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN). The experimental studies include binary and multiclass types of attacks. The results suggested that the proposed WFEU-FFDNN has greater detection accuracy than other approaches. In the instance of the UNSW-NB15, the WFEU generated an optimal feature vector consisting of 22 attributes. Using this input vector; our approach achieved overall accuracies of 87.10% and 77.16% for the binary and multiclass classification schemes, respectively. In the instance of the AWID, a reduced input vector of 26 attributes was generated by the WFEU, and the experiments demonstrated that our method obtained overall accuracies of 99.66% and 99.77% for the binary and the multiclass classification configurations, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cose.2020.101752

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Kasongo, S. M., & Sun, Y.
Venue
Computers & Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
92
Pages
101752
ISSN
0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3004777721
Cited by
373
References
1
FWCI
24.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A deep learning method with wrapper based feature extraction for wireless intrusion detection system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101752
The paper
Kasongo, S. M., & Sun, Y. (2020). A deep learning method with wrapper based feature extraction for wireless intrusion detection system. Computers & Security. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101752

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.