Cited by 169Network Security and Intrusion DetectionNetwork Packet Processing and OptimizationArtificial Immune Systems Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SwiftIDS: Real-time intrusion detection system based on LightGBM and parallel intrusion detection mechanism

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cose.2020.101984

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Jin, D., Lu, Y., Qin, J., Cheng, Z., & Mao, Z.
Affiliations
South China University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Jin, Dongzi
Venue
Computers & Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
97
Pages
101984
ISSN
0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3043844898
Cited by
169
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 4
FWCI
12.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
Funders
Guangdong Science and Technology Department
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Immune Systems Applications
Keywords
intrusion detection systems, real-time attack detection, high-speed networks, LightGBM, categorical variables, time windows, network traffic analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review