The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SwiftIDS: Real-time intrusion detection system based on LightGBM and parallel intrusion detection mechanism
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, LightGBM191 has the advantages of faster training speed, higher efficiency, lower memory usage, better accuracy192, and has been consistently outperforming other models193,194.”
From Multimodal machine learning in precision health: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [194]
Citations
Cites
MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters
Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1327452.1327492 · Cited by 18,476
LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree
(2017) · HAL · Cited by 10,512
Extreme Learning Machine for Regression and Multiclass Classification
Huang, G.-B., Zhou, H., Ding, X., & Zhang, R. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2011.2168604 · Cited by 5,575
A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set
Tavallaee, M., Bagheri, E., Lu, W., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications · doi:10.1109/cisda.2009.5356528 · Cited by 5,396
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318
Characterization of Tor Traffic using Time based Features
Lashkari, A. H., Gil, G. D., Mamun, M., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2017) · International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP) · doi:10.5220/0006105602530262 · Cited by 926
The 1999 DARPA off-line intrusion detection evaluation
Lippmann, R. P., Haines, J. W., Fried, D. J., Korba, J., & Das, K. (2000) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(00)00139-0 · Cited by 877
On Grouping for Maximum Homogeneity
Fisher, W. D. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501479 · Cited by 796
Wang, W., Sheng, Y., Wang, J., Zeng, X., Ye, X., Huang, Y., & Zhu, M. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2780250 · Cited by 685
Building an Intrusion Detection System Using a Filter-Based Feature Selection Algorithm
Ambusaidi, M. A., He, X., Nanda, P., & Tan, Z. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2016.2519914 · Cited by 648
Real-time big data processing for anomaly detection: A survey
Ariyaluran Habeeb, R. A., Nasaruddin, F., Gani, A., Targio Hashem, I. A., Ahmed, E., & Imran, M. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.006 · Cited by 487
An intrusion detection and prevention system in cloud computing: A systematic review
Patel, A., Taghavi, M., Bakhtiyari, K., & Celestino Júnior, J. (2013) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2012.08.007 · Cited by 425
Algorithms for advanced packet classification with ternary CAMs
Lakshminarayanan, K., Rangarajan, A., & Venkatachary, S. (2005) · ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM) · doi:10.1145/1080091.1080115 · Cited by 274
Toward scalable internet traffic measurement and analysis with Hadoop
Lee, Y., & Lee, Y. (2012) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/2427036.2427038 · Cited by 195
Marir, N., Wang, H., Feng, G., Li, B., & Jia, M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2875045 · Cited by 184
Time and area efficient pattern matching on FPGAs
Baker, Z. K., & Prasanna, V. K. (2004) · ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) · doi:10.1145/968280.968312 · Cited by 156
Jamshed, M. A., Lee, J., Moon, S., Yun, I., Deok-jin, K., Lee, S., Yi, Y., & Park, K. (2012) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/2382196.2382232 · Cited by 151
Wang, D., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2017) · International Conference on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (ICCBB) · doi:10.1145/3155077.3155079 · Cited by 150
A Predictive Data Feature Exploration-Based Air Quality Prediction Approach
Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, M., Ma, Q., Zhao, J., Zhang, R., Wang, Q., & Huang, L. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2897754 · Cited by 150
Data Mining Techniques in Intrusion Detection Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
Salo, F., Injadat, M., Nassif, A. B., Shami, A. A., & Essex, A. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2872784 · Cited by 132
Packet and Flow Based Network Intrusion Dataset
Gogoi, P., Bhuyan, M. H., Bhattacharyya, D. K., & Kalita, J. K. (2012) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32129-0_34 · Cited by 128
Real time intrusion detection system for ultra-high-speed big data environments
Rathore, M. M., Ahmad, A., & Paul, A. (2016) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-015-1615-5 · Cited by 119
Feature selection and classification using flexible neural tree
Chen, Y., Abraham, A., & Yang, B. (2006) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2006.01.022 · Cited by 115
Meiners, C. R., Patel, J., Norige, E., Torng, E. K., & Liu, A. X. (2010) · Cited by 109
Kang, S., & Kim, K. J. (2016) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-015-0527-8 · Cited by 92
Improving network security using genetic algorithm approach
Banković, Z., Stepanović, D., Bojanić, S., & Nieto-Taladriz, O. (2007) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2007.05.010 · Cited by 89
Fossaceca, J. M., Mazzuchi, T. A., & Sarkani, S. (2015) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.040 · Cited by 86
Intrusion detection system using hybrid binary PSO and K-nearest neighborhood algorithm
Syarif, A. R., & Gata, W. (2017) · International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and System (ICTS) · doi:10.1109/icts.2017.8265667 · Cited by 78
Varma, P. R. K., Kumari, V. V., & Kumar, S. S. (2016) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.203 · Cited by 62
Hashdoop: A MapReduce framework for network anomaly detection
Fontugne, R., Mazel, J., & Fukuda, K. (2014) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) · doi:10.1109/infcomw.2014.6849281 · Cited by 52
A Practical Network-Based Intrusion Detection and Prevention System
Wattanapongsakorn, N., Srakaew, S., Wonghirunsombat, E., Sribavonmongkol, C., Junhom, T., Jongsubsook, P., & Charnsripinyo, C. (2012) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom.2012.46 · Cited by 39
A multi-gigabit rate deep packet inspection algorithm using TCAM
Sung, J.-S., Kang, S.-M., Lee, Y., Kwon, T.-G., & Kim, B.-T. (2005) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/glocom.2005.1577667 · Cited by 38
An Effective Technique for Intrusion Detection Using Neuro-Fuzzy and Radial SVM Classifier
Chandrasekhar, A. M., & Raghuveer, K. (2013) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-6154-8_49 · Cited by 20
Singh, P. B., & Tiwari, A. (2015) · International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication Engineering · doi:10.1109/icacce.2015.49 · Cited by 17
An Efficient Algorithm for Network Intrusion Detection System
Jaiganesh, V., Mangayarkarasi, S., & Sumathi, P. (2014) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/15771-4100 · Cited by 15
Network Intrusion Prediction Model based on RBF Features Classification
Xing-zhu, W. (2016) · International Journal of Security and Its Applications · doi:10.14257/ijsia.2016.10.4.23 · Cited by 7
Sourour, M., Bouhoula, A., & Abbes, T. (2010) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1002/sec.161 · Cited by 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multimodal machine learning in precision health: A scoping review
Kline, A., Wang, H., Li, Y., Dennis, S., Hutch, M., Xu, Z., Wang, F., Cheng, F., & Luo, Y. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00712-8 · Cited by 528
Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Using Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM)
Rufo, D. D., Debelee, T. G., Ibenthal, A., & Negera, W. G. (2021) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics11091714 · Cited by 317
Zhang, D., & Gong, Y. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3042848 · Cited by 241
An improved anomaly detection model for IoT security using decision tree and gradient boosting
Douiba, M., Benkirane, S., Guezzaz, A., & Azrour, M. (2022) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-022-04783-y · Cited by 194
Zero-day attack detection: a systematic literature review
Ahmad, R., Alsmadi, I. M., Al-Hamdani, W. A., & Tawalbeh, L. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10437-z · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, D., Lu, Y., Qin, J., Cheng, Z., & Mao, Z.
- Affiliations
- South China University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Jin, Dongzi
- Venue
- Computers & Security
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 97
- Pages
- 101984
- ISSN
- 0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3043844898
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 12.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Guangdong Science and Technology Department
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Immune Systems Applications
- Keywords
- intrusion detection systems, real-time attack detection, high-speed networks, LightGBM, categorical variables, time windows, network traffic analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review