CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 230IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AIPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A survey on privacy and security of Internet of Things

Ogonji, Mark Mbock, Okeyo, George, Wafula, Joseph Muliaro·2020·Computer Science Review
DOI 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100312
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100312

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. Farooq, 2015, A critical analysis on the security concerns of internet of things (IoT), Int. J. Comput. Appl., 111, 1
  2. Gubbi, 2013, Internet of things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 29, 1, 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bandyopadhyay, 2011, Internet of things: Applications and challenges in technology and standardization, Wirel. Pers. Commun., 58, 49, 10.1007/s11277-011-0288-5 · DOI
  4. Rao, 2017, Design of architecture for efficient integration of internet of things and cloud computing, Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci., 8, 392
  5. McEwen, 2013, The internet of things: An overview, Des. Internet Things, 8
  6. W. Mingjun, et al. A research on experimental system for Internet of Things major and application project, in: 3rd International Conference in System Science, Engineering Design and Manufacturing Informatization, ICSEM, 2012, pp. 261–263. · DOI
  7. Atzori, 2010, The Internet of Things: A survey, Comput. Netw., 54, 2787, 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Miorandi, 2012, Ad Hoc Networks Internet of things, : Vision, applications and research challenges, Ad Hoc Netw., 10, 1497, 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016 · DOI
  9. Sicari, 2015, Security, Privacy & Trust in Internet of Things : the road ahead, Comput. Netw., 146, 10.1016/j.comnet.2014.11.008 · DOI
  10. Riahi Sfar, 2018, A roadmap for security challenges in the Internet of Things, Digit. Commun. Netw., 4, 118, 10.1016/j.dcan.2017.04.003 · DOI
  11. Neshenko, 2019, Demystifying IoT security: An exhaustive survey on IoT vulnerabilities and a first empirical look on internet-scale IoT exploitations, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 29, 2702, 10.1109/COMST.2019.2910750 · DOI
  12. B. Pejcinovic, Using Systematic Literature Reviews to Enhance Student Learning, in: 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015.
  13. A. Dohr, R. Modre-Osprian, M. Drobics, D. Hayn, G. Schreier, The internet of things for ambient assisted living, in: Seventh International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, ITNG, 2010, pp. 804–809. · DOI
  14. Kumar, 2014, A survey on Internet of Things, : Security and privacy issues, Int. J. Comput. Appl., 90, 20
  15. Uttarkar, 2014, Internet of things, : Architecture and security, Int. J. Comput. Appl., 3, 12
  16. Huang, 2016, SecIoT, : a security framework for the internet of things, Secur. Commun. Netw., 3083, 10.1002/sec.1259 · DOI
  17. Keyur K Patel, 2016, Internet of things-IOT, : Definition, characteristics, architecture, enabling technologies, application & future challenges, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Comput., 6
  18. Lee, 2015, The Internet of things (IoT): Applications, invest- ments, and challenges for enterprises, Bus. Horiz., 58, 431, 10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.008 · DOI
  19. N. Aleisa, K. Renaud, Privacy of the Internet of Things: A Systematic Literature Review, in: Proc. 50th Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., 2017. · DOI
  20. S. Notra, M. Siddiqi, H.H. Gharakheili, V. Sivaraman, R. Boreli, An Experimental Study of Security and Privacy Risks with Emerging Household Appliances ( Position Paper ), in: Commun. Netw. Secur. (CNS), 2014 IEEE Conf., 2014, pp. 79–84. · DOI
  21. M. Harbach, S. Fahl, M. Smith, Who’s afraid of which bad Wolf? A survey of IT security risk awareness, in: Proc. Comput. Secur. Found. Work., Vol. 2014-Janua, 2014, pp. 97–110. · DOI
  22. K. Zhao, L. Ge, A survey on the Internet of things security, in: Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, CIS, 2013, pp. 663–667. · DOI
  23. L.F. Cranor, A Framework for Reasoning About the Human in the Loop, in: Proc. 1st Conf. Usability, Psychol. Secur., 2008, pp. 1:1–1:15.
  24. Zghal Rebaï, 2013, An adaptive method for user profile learning, vol. 8133
  25. M. Mezghani, et al. Analyzing tagged resources for social interests detection To cite this version: HAL Id : hal-01178560, in: 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems ICEIS 2014, 2015,pp. 340–345. · DOI
  26. Tchuente, 2013, Derivation of user profiles from social networks: a community approach of egocentric networks, Ingénierie Syst. Inform., 18, 11
  27. E. Khanfir, C. El Hog, R.B. Djmeaa, I.A.B. Amor, A web service selection framework based on user’s context and qos, in: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, ICWS, 2014, pp. 708–711. · DOI
  28. Miranda, 2015, From the internet of things to the internet of people, IEEE Internet Comput., 19, 40, 10.1109/MIC.2015.24 · DOI
  29. Nitti, 2014, Trustworthiness management in the social internet of things, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 26, 10.1109/TKDE.2013.105 · DOI
  30. Leloglu, 2017, A review of security concerns in internet of things, J. Comput. Commun., 5, 121, 10.4236/jcc.2017.51010 · DOI
  31. Abdur, 2017, Security issues in the internet of things (IoT): A comprehensive study, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 8
  32. T. Xu, J. Wendt, M. Potkonjak, Security of IoT Systems: Design Challenges and Opportunities, in: IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, Digest of Technical Papers, 2014, pp. 417–423. · DOI
  33. M. Hossain, M. Fotouhi, R. Hasan, Towards an Analysis of Security Issues, Challenges, and Open Problems in the Internet of Things, in : 2015 IEEE World Congr. Serv., No. June, 2015, pp. 21–28. · DOI
  34. Ziegeldorf, 2014, Privacy in the internet of things : Threats and challenges, Secur. Commun. Netw., 2728, 10.1002/sec.795 · DOI
  35. R. Kang, L. Dabbish, N. Fruchter, S. Kiesler, My data just goes everywhere:’ User mental models of the internet and implications for privacy and security, in: SOUPS 2015 - Proc. 11th Symp. Usable Priv. Secur., 2019, pp. 39–52.
  36. Abdul-Ghani, 2019, A comprehensive study of security and privacy guidelines, threats, and countermeasures: An IoT perspective, J. Sens. Actuator Netw., 8, 10.3390/jsan8020022 · DOI
  37. Abuagoub, 2019, IoT Security evolution: Challenges and countermeasures review, Int. J. Commun. Netw. Inf. Secur., 11, 342
  38. J. Daubert, A. Wiesmaier, P. Kikiras, A View on Privacy & Trust in IoT, in: IEEE International Conference on Communication (ICC) 2015 Workshop Proceedings, London, UK, 2015. · DOI
  39. Wang, 2013, Distributed trust management mechanism for the internet of things, Appl. Mech. Mater., 347
  40. Roman, 2011, Securing the internet of things, IEEE Comput., 44, 51, 10.1109/MC.2011.291 · DOI
  41. I. Andrea, C. Chrysostomou, G. Hadjichristofi, Internet of Things: Security vulnerabilities and challenges, in: Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, Vol. 2016-February, 2016. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Hassija, 2019, A survey on IoT security: Application areas, security threats, and solution architectures, IEEE Access, 7, 82721, 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924045 · DOI
  43. Celik, 2019, Program analysis of commodity IoT applications for security and privacy: Challenges and opportunities, ACM Comput. Surv., 52, 10.1145/3333501 · DOI
  44. Falcone, 2018, On the users’ acceptance of IoT systems: A theoretical approach, Information, 9, 10.3390/info9030053 · DOI
  45. Jain, 2016, Internet of things: Architecture, security goals, and challenges- A survey, Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng., 2, 154
  46. Weber, 2010, Internet of things – New security and privacy challenges, Comput. Secur. Rev. Sci.
  47. W. He, et al. Rethinking access control and authentication for the Home Internet of Things (IoT), in: Proc. 27th USENIX Secur. Symp., 2018, pp. 255–272.
  48. T. Le, M.W. Mutka, Access control with delegation for smart home applications, in: IoTDI 2019 - Proc. 2019 Internet Things Des. Implement., 2019, pp. 142–147. · DOI
  49. B. Anggorojati, P.N. Mahalle, N.R. Prasad, R. Prasad, Capability-based access control delegation model on the federated IoT network, in: Wirel. Pers. Multimed. Commun. (WPMC), 2012 15th Int. Symp., 2012, pp. 604–608.
  50. B. Ur, J. Jung, S. Schechter, The current state of access control for smart devices in homes, in: Workshop on Home Usable Privacy and Security, HUPS, 2014.
  51. Guoping, 2011, The research of access control based on UCON in the internet of things, J. Softw., 6, 724
  52. Chaabouni, 2019, Network intrusion detection for IoT security based on learning techniques, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 21, 10.1109/COMST.2019.2896380 · DOI
  53. Butun, 2020, Security of the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, attacks, and countermeasures, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 22, 616, 10.1109/COMST.2019.2953364 · DOI
  54. Gupta, 2015, Security and privacy issues in internet of things (IoT), IJRCS - Int. J. Res. Comput. Sci., 3, 18
  55. Mohaisen, 2013, The sybil attacks and defenses: A survey, Smart Comput. Rev., 3, 10.6029/smartcr.2013.06.009 · DOI
  56. Singla, 2013, Review on security issues and attacks in wireless sensor networks, IJARCSSE, 3, 529
  57. Tuhin, 2015, Survey of security and privacy issues of internet of things, Int. J. Advanced Networking and Applications, 6, 2372
  58. B. Khoo, RFID as an Enabler of the Internet of Things: Issues of Security and Privacy, in: International Conference on Internet of Things and International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing 2011, 2011, pp. 709–712. · DOI
  59. Anwar, 2014, Security issues and attacks in wireless sensor network, World Applied Sciences Journal, 30, 1224
  60. Ramakrishna, 2018, A survey on various IoT attacks and its countermeasures, Int. J. Eng. Res. Comput. Sci. Eng., 5, 2320
  61. Premkumar, 2019, Various defense countermeasures against dos attacks in wireless sensor networks, Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., 8, 2926
  62. Abomhara, 2015, Cyber security and the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders and attacks, J. Cyber Secur. Mob., 4, 65, 10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.414 · DOI
  63. D. Miessler, Securing the Internet of Things : Mapping Attack Surface Areas Using the OWASP IoT Top 10, in: RSA Conference 2015, 2015.
  64. Roman, 2013, On the features and challenges, Comput. Netw., 57
  65. Granjal, 2015, Security for the internet of things: A survey of existing protocols and open research issues, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., 17, 1294, 10.1109/COMST.2015.2388550 · DOI
  66. A. Cui, S.J. Stolfo, A quantitative analysis of the insecurity of embedded network devices: Results of a wide-area scan, in: Proc. - Annu. Comput. Secur. Appl. Conf. ACSAC, 2010, pp. 97–106. · DOI
  67. Y.M. Pa Pa, S. Suzuki, K. Yoshioka, T. Matsumoto, T. Kasama, C. Rossow, IoTPOT: Analysing the rise of IoT compromises, in: 9th USENIX Work. Offensive Technol., WOOT 2015, 2015.
  68. J. Czyz, M. Luckie, M. Allman, M. Bailey, Don’t Forget to Lock the Back Door! A Characterization of IPv6 Network Security Policy, Netw. Distrib. Syst. Secur. Symp., No. February, 2017, pp. 21–24. · DOI
  69. Furfaro, 2017, Using virtual environments for the assessment of cybersecurity issues in iot scenarios, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory, 73, 43, 10.1016/j.simpat.2016.09.007 · DOI
  70. A. Tekeoglu, A.S. Tosun, A testbed for security and privacy analysis of iot devices, in: 2016 IEEE 13th International Conference on. IEEE, 2016 in Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems, MASS, 2016, pp. 343–348. · DOI
  71. A. Cui, M. Costello, S.J. Stolfo, When firmware modifications attack: A case study of embedded exploitation, in: NDSS, 2013.
  72. Z. Berkay Celik, et al. Open access to the Proceedings of the 27th USENIX Security Symposium is sponsored by USENIX. Sensitive Information Tracking in Commodity IoT Sensitive Information Tracking in Commodity IoT, in: USENIX Secur. Symp., 2018.
  73. J. Wurm, K. Hoang, O. Arias, A.-R. Sadeghi, Y. Jin, Security analysis on consumer and industrial iot devices, in: Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), 2016 21st Asia and South Pacific, 2016, pp. 519–524. · DOI
  74. Singh, 2019, Energy efficient and side-channel secure cryptographic hardware for IoT-edge nodes, IEEE Internet Things J., 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2861324 · DOI
  75. Jeske, 2017, Familiarity with Internet threats: Beyond awareness, Comput. Secur., 66, 129, 10.1016/j.cose.2017.01.010 · DOI
  76. Furman, 2012, Basing cyber- security training on user perceptions, IEEE Secur. Priv., 10, 40, 10.1109/MSP.2011.180 · DOI
  77. S. Aragon, M. Tiloca, M. Maass, M. Hollick, S. Raza, ACE of spades in the iot security game: A flexible ipsec security profile for access control, in: 2018 IEEE Conf. Commun. Netw. Secur., CNS 2018, 2018. · DOI
  78. Martínez, 2017, A user-centric Internet of Things platform to empower users for managing security and privacy concerns in the Internet of Energy, Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw., 13, 10.1177/1550147717727974 · DOI
  79. E. Zeng, F. Roesner, Understanding and improving security and privacy in multi-user smart homes: A design exploration and in-home user study, in: Proc. 28th USENIX Secur. Symp., 2019, pp. 159–176.
  80. K. Yang, D. Forte, M. Tehranipoor, Protecting endpoint devices in IoT supply chain. in: 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), pp. 351–356. · DOI
  81. E. Fernandes, J. Paupore, A. Rahmati, D. Simionato, M. Conti, A. Prakash, Flowfence: Practical data protection for emerging iot application frameworks, in: USENIX Security Symposium, 2016.
  82. W. Chen, et al. Taprint : Secure Text Input for Commodity Smart Wristbands, in: ACM Int. Conf. Mob. Comput. Netw., 2019. · DOI
  83. Z. Yan, Q. Song, R. Tan, Y. Li, A.W.K. Kong, Towards touch-to-access device authentication using induced body electric potentials, in: Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. Mob. Comput. Networking, MOBICOM, 2019. · DOI
  84. X. Li, F. Yan, F. Zuo, Q. Zeng, L. Luo, Touch Well Before Use: Intuitive and Secure Authentication for IoT Devices, in: Proc. 25th Annu. Int. Conf. Mob. Comput. Netw., 2019, pp. 1–17. · DOI
  85. V. Nguyen, et al. Body-guided communications: A low-power, highly-confined primitive to track and secure every touch, in: Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. Mob. Comput. Networking, MOBICOM, 2018, pp. 353–368. · DOI
  86. B. Hutchins, M. Zhou, A. Reddy, M. Li, W. Jin, L. Yang, Beat-PIN: A user authentication mechanism for wearable devices through secret beats, in: ASIACCS 2018 - Proc. 2018 ACM Asia Conf. Comput. Commun. Secur., 2018, pp. 101–115. · DOI
  87. F. Lin, C. Song, Y. Zhuang, W. Xu, C. Li, K. Ren, Cardiac scan: A non-contact and continuous heart-based user authentication system, in: Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. Mob. Comput. Networking, MOBICOM, Vol. Part F1312, 2017, pp. 315–328. · DOI
  88. M.A.M. Isa, N.N. Mohamed, H. Hashim, S.F.S. Adnan, J. Manan, R. Mahmod, A lightweight and secure tftp protocol for smart environment, in: 2012 IEEE Symposium in Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics, ISCAIE, 2012, pp. 302–306. · DOI
  89. J. Granjal, E. Monteiro, J.S. Silva, On the effectiveness of end- to-end security for internet-integrated sensing applications, in: 2012 IEEE International Conference in Green Computing and Communications, GreenCom, 2012, pp. 87–93. · DOI
  90. C. Li, et al. HlcAuth: Key-free and secure communications via home-limited channel, in: ASIACCS 2018 - Proc. 2018 ACM Asia Conf. Comput. Commun. Secur., 2018, pp. 29–35. · DOI
  91. Chong, 2019, Human factors in the privacy and security of the internet of things, Ergon. Des., 27, 5
  92. Xie, 2014, An item-level access control framework for inter-system security in the internet of things, Appl. Mech. Mater., 1430, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.548-549.1430 · DOI
  93. M. Patton, E. Gross, R. Chinn, S. Forbis, L. Walker, H. Chen, Uninvited Connections: A Study of Vulnerable Devices on the Internet of Things (IoT), in: Joint Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference, JISIC, 2014, pp. 232–235. · DOI
  94. Z. Zhang, RETRACTED ARTICLE: Research on RMB internationalization path, in: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Manag. Sci. Electron. Commer., AIMSEC 2011, 2011, pp. 578–581. · DOI
  95. S. Ferdous, R.K. Hussein, O. Madini, A. Alharthi, R.J. Walters, G. Wills, Threat Taxonomy for Cloud of Things, in: Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics, United Scholars Publications, USA, 2017, pp. 1–27.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
Ogonji, M. M., Okeyo, G., & Wafula, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (KE)
  • De Montfort University (GB)
Corresponding author
Ogonji, Mark Mbock
ORCID
Okeyo, George
Venue
Computer Science Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
38
Pages
100312
ISSN
1574-0137 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100312
OpenAlex
W3093117838
Cited by
230
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 3
FWCI
11.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Computer Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
Internet of Things, Internet of Things security, IoT privacy, threat taxonomy, attack surface, vulnerability (computer security), countermeasures, personal data exposure, user adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review