Cited by 599African Botany and Ecology StudiesAgroforestry and silvopastoral systemsClimate change impacts on agriculture

Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa

Open access
Mbow, Cheikh, Van Noordwijk, Meine, Luedeling, Eike, Neufeldt, Henry, Minang, Peter A, Kowero, Godwin·2014·Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

Abstract

Trees inside and outside forests contribute to food security in Africa in the face of climate variability and change. They also provide environmental and social benefits as part of farming livelihoods. Varied ecological and socio-economic conditions have given rise to specific forms of agroforestry in different parts of Africa. Policies that institutionally segregate forest from agriculture miss opportunities for synergy at landscape scale. More explicit inclusion of agroforestry and the integration of agriculture and forestry agendas in global initiatives on climate change adaptation and mitigation can increase their effectiveness. We identify research gaps and overarching research questions for the contributions in this special issue that may help shape current opinion in environmental sustainability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

  • An Introduction to Agroforestry

    Nair, P. K. R. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1608-4 · Cited by 1,438 · cited 2× · see citing works

    “What differentiates agroforestry from other land uses is the deliberate inclusion of woody perennials on farms, which usually leads to significant economic and/ or ecological interactions between woody and non-woody system components [22].”

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mbow, C., Van Noordwijk, M., Luedeling, E., Neufeldt, H., Minang, P. A., & Kowero, G.
Affiliations
  • World Agroforestry Centre (KE)
  • African Forest Forum (KE)
Corresponding author
Mbow, Cheikh
Venue
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
6
Pages
61-67
ISSN
1877-3435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084863124
Cited by
599
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • TaCCIRe Repository (Sokoine University of Agriculture) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › African Botany and Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
Keywords
agroforestry, food security, climate change adaptation, climate change mitigation, trees outside forests, climate variability, agricultural livelihoods, forest policy, research gaps, Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review