Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 662

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metagenomics and future perspectives in virus discovery

Open access
Mokili, John L, Rohwer, Forest, Dutilh, Bas E·2012·Current Opinion in Virology

Abstract

Highlights ► Viruses are the most abundant and most diverse biological entity of the biosphere. ► Rate of virus discoveries by metagenomics: higher than all other methods combined. ► Sequences with no homolog in public database are not all ‘junk’ — but treasure trove and blueprint of virus discovery. ► Metagenomics finds fields of application in clinical virology, public health and beyond. ► We propose the metagenomic Koch's postulates to identify unculturable etiological agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.coviro.2011.12.004

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 662

Metadata

Authors
Mokili, J. L., Rohwer, F., & Dutilh, B. E.
Venue
Current Opinion in Virology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
63-77
ISSN
1879-6257 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013544175
Cited by
662
References
11
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metagenomics and future perspectives in virus discovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.coviro.2011.12.004
The paper
Mokili, J. L., Rohwer, F., & Dutilh, B. E. (2012). Metagenomics and future perspectives in virus discovery. Current Opinion in Virology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2011.12.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.