Cited by 1,644Advanced Chemical Physics StudiesMachine Learning in Materials ScienceThermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys

Pseudopotentials for high-throughput DFT calculations

Open access
Garrity, Kevin F., Bennett, Joseph W., Rabe, Karin M., Vanderbilt, David·2014·Computational Materials Science

Abstract

The increasing use of high-throughput density-functional theory (DFT) calculations in the computational design and optimization of materials requires the availability of a comprehensive set of soft and transferable pseudopotentials. Here we present design criteria and testing results for a new open-source “GBRV” ultrasoft pseudopotential library that has been optimized for use in high-throughput DFT calculations. We benchmark the GBRV potentials, as well as two other pseudopotential sets available in the literature, to all-electron calculations in order to validate their accuracy. The results allow us to draw conclusions about the accuracy of modern pseudopotentials in a variety of chemical environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.053

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All tested PSP libraries are based on the PBE GGA exchange-correlation functional and include norm-conserving, ultrasoft, and projector-augmented wave pseudization approaches.

    “All the tested PSP libraries are based on the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) for the exchangecorrelation functional of Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof (PBE) [8] and they include the three main pseudization approaches [12]: norm-conserving (NC) [13], ultrasoft (US) [14] and projector-augmented wave (PAW) [15].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [15][15] J. W. Bennett, Phys. Proc. 34 , 14 (2012). -
  2. [16][16] K. Lejaeghere, V. V. Speybroeck, G. V. Oost, and S. Cottenier, arXiv:1204.2733v3 (2012). - · arXiv
  3. [36][36] X. Ge, B. I. Adetunji, M. Monni, E. Kucukbenli, A. D. Corso, and S. de Gironcoli, Inter. Workshop on Comput. Phys. and Mater. Sci., Poster Abstract (2013). -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garrity, K. F., Bennett, J. W., Rabe, K. M., & Vanderbilt, D.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Garrity, Kevin F.
Venue
Computational Materials Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
81
Pages
446-452
ISSN
0927-0256 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159795178
Cited by
1,644
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 159 · 2025: 201 · 2024: 179 · 2023: 175 · 2022: 188 · 2021: 159 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 1
FWCI
24.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational Materials Science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
Funders
  • NSF (DMR-10-05838)
  • ONR (N00014-09-1-0302, N00014-12-1-1040)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys
Keywords
pseudopotentials, ultrasoft pseudopotentials, all-electron calculations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review