Cited by 59Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Enhanced Mental Health Interventions in the Emergency Department: Suicide and Suicide Attempt Prevention

Open access
Hughes, Jennifer L., Asarnow, Joan R.·2013·Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Suicide is the third leading cause of death in adolescents, and often youths with suicidal behavior or ideation present to the emergency department (ED) for care. Many suicidal youths do not receive mental health care after discharge from the ED, and interventions are needed to enhance linkage to outpatient intervention. This paper describes the Family Intervention for Suicide Prevention (FISP). Designed for use in emergency settings, the FISP is a family-based cognitive-behavior therapy session designed to increase motivation for follow-up treatment, support, coping, and safety, augmented by care linkage telephone contacts after discharge. In a randomized trial of the intervention, the FISP was shown to significantly increase the likelihood of youths receiving outpatient treatment, including psychotherapy and combined medication and psychotherapy. The FISP is a brief, focused, efficacious treatment that can be delivered in the ED to improve the probability of follow-up treatment for suicidal youths.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpem.2013.01.002

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Asarnow and colleagues demonstrated that FISP could effectively link youth and parents to care and was delivered in the ED setting in 80.9% of patients.

    “Asarnow and colleagues53 demonstrated that a brief family-based ED intervention, the Family Intervention for Suicide Prevention (FISP), could effectively link youth and parents to care and this intervention was effectively delivered in the ED setting in 80.9% of patients54.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, J. L., & Asarnow, J. R.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Hughes, Jennifer L.
Venue
Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
28-34
ISSN
1522-8401 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964857770
Cited by
59
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH078082)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
suicide prevention, suicide attempt prevention, adolescents, emergency department, follow-up treatment, telephone follow-up, suicidal ideation, mental health interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review