Cited by 57Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

Effect of a Motivational Interviewing–Based Intervention on Initiation of Mental Health Treatment and Mental Health After an Emergency Department Visit Among Suicidal Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Grupp-Phelan, Jacqueline, Stevens, Jack, Boyd, Stephanie, Cohen, Daniel M., Ammerman, Robert T., Liddy-Hicks, Stacey, Heck, Kendra, Marcus, Steven C. +3 more·2019·JAMA Network Open

Abstract

Importance: Emergency department (ED) visits present opportunities to identify and refer suicidal youth for outpatient mental health care, although this practice is not routine. Objective: To examine whether a motivational interviewing-based intervention increases linkage of adolescents to outpatient mental health services and reduces depression symptoms and suicidal ideation in adolescents seeking emergency care for non-mental health-related concerns who screen positive for suicide risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized clinical trial, adolescents aged 12 to 17 years who screened positive on the Ask Suicide Screening Questions (ASQ) during a nonpsychiatric ED visit at 2 academic pediatric EDs in Ohio were recruited from April 2013 to July 2015. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed from September 2018 to October 2019. Interventions: The Suicidal Teens Accessing Treatment After an Emergency Department Visit (STAT-ED) intervention included motivational interviewing to target family engagement, problem solving, referral assistance, and limited case management. The enhanced usual care (EUC) intervention consisted of brief mental health care consultation and referral. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were mental health treatment initiation and attendance within 2 months of ED discharge and suicidal ideation (assessed by the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire JR) and depression symptoms (assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale) at 2 and 6 months. Exploratory outcomes included treatment initiation and attendance and suicide attempts at 6 months. Results: A total of 168 participants were randomized and 159 included in the intention-to-treat analyses (mean [SD] age, 15.0 [1.5] years; 126 [79.2%] female; and 80 [50.3%] white). Seventy-nine participants were randomized to receive the STAT-ED intervention and 80 to receive EUC. At 2 months, youth in the STAT-ED group had similar rates of mental health treatment initiation compared with youth in the EUC group as assessed by parent report (29 [50.9%] vs 22 [34.9%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.08; 95% CI, 0.97-4.45) and administrative data from mental health care agencies (19 [29.7%] vs 11 [19.3%]; adjusted OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.76-4.15). At 2 months, youth in the STAT-ED group and the EUC group had similar rates of treatment attendance (1 appointment: 6 [9.7%] vs 2 [3.6%]; adjusted OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 0.56-15.73; ≥2 appointments: 10 [16.1%] vs 7 [12.7%]; adjusted OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.50-4.11). There were no significant group × time differences in suicidal ideation (F = 0.28; P = .72) and depression symptoms (F = 0.49; P = .60) during the 6-month follow-up period. In exploratory analyses, at 6 months, STAT-ED participants had significantly higher rates of agency-reported mental health treatment initiation (adjusted OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.16-5.28) and more completed appointments (t99.7 = 2.58; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings indicate that no differences were found on any primary outcome by study condition. However, STAT-ED was more efficacious than EUC at increasing mental health treatment initiation and attendance at 6 months. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01779414.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17941

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General and National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention National Strategy for Suicide Prevention: Goals and Objectives for Action. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2012. 23136686

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grupp-Phelan, J., Stevens, J., Boyd, S., Cohen, D. M., Ammerman, R. T., Liddy-Hicks, S., Heck, K., Marcus, S. C., Stone, L., Campo, J. V., & Bridge, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, UCSF (University of California, San Francisco) Benioff Children’s Hospitals, San Francisco, California
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Bridge, Jeffrey A.
Venue
JAMA Network Open
Published
2019-12-20
Volume
2
Issue
12
Pages
e1917941
ISSN
2574-3805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995803888
Cited by
57
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JAMA Network Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (R01CE002129)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM104942)
  • National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
motivational interviewing, suicidal adolescents, emergency department visits, outpatient psychiatric care, suicidal ideation, depressive symptoms, suicide risk screening, family involvement, case management, suicide attempts, pediatric emergency care, suicide prevention, school-based intervention, school-based mental health services
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Emergency Services, Psychiatric, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Suicide, Attempted, United States, Treatment Outcome, Suicidal Ideation, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review